ML-QuantSubscribe

arXivDerivatives & Volatility

Arithmetic Models for Commodity Futures, Vanilla, and Calendar Spread Options

An arithmetic stochastic volatility model for crude oil provides semi-closed-form pricing for vanilla and calendar spread options, hedges daily risk effectively, and improves fit over geometric models.

Featured in No. 136 on 23 Oct 2026 · 2 days after release

Model-free volatility Level (mean over maturities from 42 to 210 business days, top) and slope (42-day less 210-day
Figure 9: Model-free volatility Level (mean over maturities from 42 to 210 business days, top) and slope (42-day less 210-day value, bottom) of \mathcal{M}_{2} , in $/bbl a year. (a) Root mean squared error (RMSE) of the model-implied level and slope for V2, V3, VC3 and V3-U in each of the subperio…
Released
21 Oct 2026
First featured
No. 136 · 23 Oct 2026
Published in
Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
Fanfare
2 of 5
Identifier
arXiv:2610.28071
Authors
Malthe Rauh Johansen et al.

Abstract

From arXiv (CC0).

We develop an arithmetic multi-factor stochastic volatility model for commodity futures and options. The arithmetic specification yields a low-dimensional Markovian representation of the futures curve and semi-closed-form pricing formulas for vanilla and basket options, including calendar spread options. These properties make the model suitable for large-scale empirical estimation. We estimate the model using an unscented Kalman filter on a panel of WTI crude oil futures, vanilla options, and calendar spread options spanning 2013-2024. We find that three stochastic volatility factors are needed to capture both the level and slope of the volatility term structure, and that hedges based on these factors remove almost all of the daily risk of a portfolio of vanilla options. Calendar spread options provide information about the dependence structure of futures prices that is not captured by futures and vanilla options alone. A model estimated without calendar spread options systematically overprices them by overstating the decorrelation between adjacent futures contracts. Including these options in the estimation brings the model's decorrelation close to the observed decorrelation, which removes the overpricing and improves their hedges, at only a small loss of accuracy in the pricing and hedging of vanilla options. Finally, we show that the arithmetic model fits futures and vanilla options better than its geometric counterpart and hedges the vanilla options slightly better.

Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).

    Type to search. Try rough volatility, LLM agents or FinGPT.

    ↑↓ move↵ openesc closeFull search page