Negative Oil & Nickel Squeeze: A Feedback Model for Extreme Commodity Futures Prices
A feedback model explains extreme commodity futures prices like negative oil by connecting delivery constraints to roll options and long-short position imbalances.
Featured in No. 133 on 2 Oct 2026 · on release day
- Released
- 2 Oct 2026
- First featured
- No. 133 · 2 Oct 2026
- Published in
- Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
- Fanfare
- 3 of 5
- Identifier
- arXiv:2610.00951
- Authors
- Iosif Zimbidis and Ronnie Sircar
Abstract
From arXiv (CC0).
On April 20, 2020, the May front-month WTI oil futures contract, one day before its expiration date, opened near $\$17/$barrel and dropped far below zero in a single trading day, reaching an intraday low of $-\$40.32$ and settling at $-\$37.63$. Such market behavior was unforeseen at the time. This event, and the March 2022 nickel squeeze, illustrate how constraints on physical delivery create pressure to close futures positions and distort futures prices. We develop a feedback model that connects the resulting price distortion to a roll option, and to the imbalance between delivery-constrained long and short positions. Under lognormal benchmark dynamics, the roll-option value is shown to satisfy a pricing PDE which is nonlinear because its payoff depends on the observed futures price, which itself includes the feedback correction. Remarkably, in both cases, there is an explicit solution in terms of classical Black-Scholes-Margrabe exchange option formulas, up to solving a scalar equation. We show this allows that prices may go negative under distortion of a positive-price lognormal model. An analogous construction applies when the lognormal base is switched to Bachelier normal dynamics. Illustrations based on WTI and nickel show the imbalance required to reproduce the extreme event prices under the benchmark assumptions.
Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).