RICE-Alpha: Reliability-Informed Correction with Event Graphs for LLM-Agent Stock Forecasting

Equity-relevant news evolves through temporally dependent corporate events, making historical information useful only when event continuity, information availability, and transition reliability are modeled. Existing LLM-based financial agents incorporate historical evidence, yet they provide limited support for preserving issuer-specific chronology under point-in-time constraints and for identifying when historical transitions contribute information beyond the current forecast. We present RICE-Alpha (Reliability-Informed Correction with Event Graphs), a point-in-time stock-scoring framework that separates a history-aware multi-view Base Alpha from a reliability-calibrated residual correction derived from historical event continuation. A Multi-Tier Memory Layer grounds news interpretation in temporally eligible issuer-specific history, while a Typed Event Agent constructs event states whose successor relations are formed within issuers and pooled across firms only after valid local pairing. Matured transitions are calibrated by their empirical reliability, and the resulting graph signal is residualized against the Base Alpha and technical view to obtain the RICE Delta. On daily Nasdaq-100 and Hang Seng Index panels from 2024 to 2026, RICE-Alpha achieves the strongest results among the evaluated LLM-based agents and momentum across four predictive and four portfolio-level metrics. Its ICIR more than doubles that of the strongest baseline, while net Sharpe ratios reach 1.656 and 1.725 in the U.S. and Hong Kong, respectively. U.S. ablations further show significant reductions in IC and RankIC after Holm adjustment when major components are removed. These results indicate that historical event continuation adds incremental information when it is temporally grounded, reliability-calibrated, and introduced as a residual correction to a multi-view forecast.

1. 14 May 2025

   Can Generative AI agents behave like humans? Evidence from laboratory market experiments

   Large Language Models (LLMs) have potential in mimicking human behavior in economic markets, but need more research for improved diversity and accuracy.

   arXiv

   20cites
2. 16 Oct 2026

   AlphaPilot: Multi-Turn Tool-Using LLM Agents for Adaptive Alpha Mining with Reinforcement Learning

   A reinforcement-learning framework trains multi-turn tool-using LLM agents to discover factor expressions by conditioning on market descriptions and querying real-data feedback.

   arXiv

   3fanfare
3. 9 Oct 2026

   LiveMACE: Process-Aware Evaluation of LLM Agent Capabilities in Evolving Markets

   A benchmark evaluates frontier LLMs as live trading agents and finds that realized returns often diverge from capability-specific measurements, revealing outcome-capability gaps through decision traces.

   arXiv

   0cites
4. 9 Oct 2026

   Does Autonomous Quant Research Improve? Leakage, Evidence Scarcity and Forward Tests in an LLM Factor-Discovery Loop

   An autonomous agent evolved 940 factors over 17 days and finds that reusing backtest data inflates edge by a quarter to a third and in-sample improvement predicts worse performance.

   SSRN

   4fanfare
5. 2 Oct 2026

   Can AI Make Money in Crypto? Measuring the Gap from Backtests to Real Markets

   A benchmark compares machine learning, reinforcement learning, and large language model trading methods across historical backtests, paper trading, and live markets to measure the gap.

   arXiv

   0cites
6. 2 Oct 2026

   LiveOption: Evaluating LLM Agents in Structured Option Trading with Nonlinear Payoffs

   An evaluation framework tests language model agents on structured option trading tasks, finding current systems underperform in most real-world scenarios.

   arXiv

   0cites