LiveMACE: Process-Aware Evaluation of LLM Agent Capabilities in Evolving Markets

Evaluating agents by outcomes alone can obscure the capabilities that produce them. This problem is especially pronounced in evolving environments, where outcomes reflect a closed-loop interaction between agent behavior and changing external conditions. We introduce LiveMACEBench, a process-aware benchmark that uses live financial markets as a naturally evolving testbed for persistent LLM agents. Five frontier LLMs operate along continuous trajectories under matched Tool Use, Persistent Memory, Rule Following, and Multi-Agent Collaboration configurations. We evaluate them through both realized outcomes and mechanism-specific diagnostics derived from complete decision traces. Across 30 days of live evaluation, we find a pronounced outcome-capability gap: realized returns often diverge from capability-specific measurements, and similar outcomes can arise from markedly different patterns of mechanism use. Trace-level diagnostics further expose distinct bottlenecks across capabilities, demonstrating that mechanism access, effective mechanism use, and downstream performance are not interchangeable measures of agent capability. LiveMACEBench makes this distinction measurable, turning live markets from a performance leaderboard into a diagnostic environment for agent capability

1. 14 May 2025

   Can Generative AI agents behave like humans? Evidence from laboratory market experiments

   Large Language Models (LLMs) have potential in mimicking human behavior in economic markets, but need more research for improved diversity and accuracy.

   arXiv

   20cites
2. 9 Oct 2026

   Does Autonomous Quant Research Improve? Leakage, Evidence Scarcity and Forward Tests in an LLM Factor-Discovery Loop

   An autonomous agent evolved 940 factors over 17 days and finds that reusing backtest data inflates edge by a quarter to a third and in-sample improvement predicts worse performance.

   SSRN

   4fanfare
3. 2 Oct 2026

   Can AI Make Money in Crypto? Measuring the Gap from Backtests to Real Markets

   A benchmark compares machine learning, reinforcement learning, and large language model trading methods across historical backtests, paper trading, and live markets to measure the gap.

   arXiv

   0cites
4. 2 Oct 2026

   LiveOption: Evaluating LLM Agents in Structured Option Trading with Nonlinear Payoffs

   An evaluation framework tests language model agents on structured option trading tasks, finding current systems underperform in most real-world scenarios.

   arXiv

   0cites
5. 25 Sep 2026

   Propose, Don't Judge: An Anytime-Valid Referee for LLM Agents That Mine Investment Factors

   Proposes a statistical referee that judges investment factors proposed by language-model agents using out-of-sample market outcomes, ensuring false-discovery control at any stopping time.

   arXiv

   0cites
6. 25 Sep 2026

   AlphaDiverse: Post-Training Local Quantitative Research Agents for Diverse Exploration in Alpha Factor Mining

   Proposes a multi-agent system with post-training that automates alpha factor mining locally, using diverse research paths and joint optimization to broaden exploration while maintaining prediction quality.

   arXiv

   0cites