ML-QuantSubscribe

arXivML & AI Methods

BuySideFlow: A Point-in-Time Benchmark for LLM Agents in Investment Research

Evaluates LLM agents on 408 investment research tasks, finding that half of workflows passing result checks contain temporal violations, revealing a 50.8% gap between output agreement and temporal validity.

Featured in No. 139 on 13 Nov 2026 · 2 days after release

Joint distribution of result outcomes and temporal violations, showing 50% pass with PIT violations.
Figure 4: Joint distribution of result outcomes and confirmed PIT violations on the same 100 audited tasks. Colors encode result outcomes; hatching marks PIT violations (A1–A3). Segment labels are task counts, with result-pass/PIT-violation counts highlighted. Unhatched segments indicate no confirm…
Released
11 Nov 2026
First featured
No. 139 · 13 Nov 2026
Published in
Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
Fanfare
3 of 5
Identifier
arXiv:2611.12966
Authors
Dong Bo et al.

Abstract

From arXiv (CC0).

Large language models (LLMs) can generate SQL and SQL--Python workflows for investment research, but ensuring point-in-time (PIT) validity remains challenging. Agents must enforce disclosure cutoffs and select the appropriate historical states and record versions throughout data retrieval and financial analysis. We introduce \textsc{BuySideFlow}, a benchmark of 408 practitioner-derived Chinese-language tasks spanning equities, funds, fixed income, and macroeconomics over a fixed snapshot from a licensed production financial database. We provide executable references and a taxonomy of temporal errors, pairing result checks with expert audits of executed workflows. We evaluate nine agent configurations on all tasks, with result accuracy ranging from 16.2\% to 36.8\%. An audit of 900 runs on 100 shared tasks confirms PIT violations in 193 of the 380 runs that pass result checks (50.8\%), showing that output agreement alone does not establish temporal validity.

Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).

    Type to search. Try rough volatility, LLM agents or FinGPT.

    ↑↓ move↵ openesc closeFull search page