ML-QuantSubscribe

arXivRisk, Credit & Banking

Hidden Tails: Certifying Tail-Risk Claims under Selective Labels

The research derives bounds on conditional value-at-risk when outcome data is hidden, enabling statistical certificates for tail-risk claims across predictors.

Featured in No. 139 on 13 Nov 2026 · 3 days after release

CVaR bounds showing how selective labeling creates ambiguity in tail risk assessment.
Figure 1: Risk ambiguity and statistical uncertainty for one fixed predictor. (a) The same observed law is compatible with hidden-outcome laws giving population CVaR 0.36 and 0.54. (b) The dark segment is the sharp population interval; pale extensions account for estimating its endpoints from a fin…
Released
10 Nov 2026
First featured
No. 139 · 13 Nov 2026
Published in
Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
Fanfare
2 of 5
Identifier
arXiv:2611.12713
Authors
El Mustapha Mansouri

Abstract

From arXiv (CC0).

Historical decisions determine which outcomes are observed, potentially concealing a predictor's largest errors. Even unlimited data from the same observation process can therefore leave population tail risk unresolved. Here we derive sharp bounds on conditional value-at-risk, the average loss in a specified upper tail, for binary outcomes and bounded losses. These bounds span exactly the risks compatible with the observations and a stated limit on how outcome odds differ between observed and hidden cases at the same covariate values. Under stated regularity conditions, calibrated statistical certificates cover these ranges simultaneously across candidate predictors, supporting risk limits and model comparisons while separating statistical uncertainty from persistent ambiguity. For a fixed predictor and loss threshold, we derive a minimum-cost allocation for reducing excess-loss ambiguity by prioritizing hidden outcomes according to ambiguity removed per unit cost. This allocation treats audited population contributions as known and retains the original sensitivity bounds separately for audited and still-hidden outcomes. In controlled masking experiments with known loan repayments, recovering about 16% of hidden labels removes a median 61% of estimated fixed-threshold ambiguity, compared with 16% for random recovery. These results connect population tail-risk claims to the available evidence and identify where additional outcomes can sharpen their assessment.

Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).

    Type to search. Try rough volatility, LLM agents or FinGPT.

    ↑↓ move↵ openesc closeFull search page