---
title: Hidden Tails: Certifying Tail-Risk Claims under Selective Labels
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2611.12713/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-11-14
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2611.12713
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.12713
featured: 2026-11-13
citations: unknown
topic: Risk, Credit & Banking
---


# Hidden Tails: Certifying Tail-Risk Claims under Selective Labels

The research derives bounds on conditional value-at-risk when outcome data is hidden, enabling statistical certificates for tail-risk claims across predictors.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.12713
- Identifier: arXiv:2611.12713
- Released: 2026-11-10
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 139 (2026-11-13): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-11-13/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Risk, Credit & Banking
- Authors: El Mustapha Mansouri

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

Historical decisions determine which outcomes are observed, potentially concealing a predictor's largest errors. Even unlimited data from the same observation process can therefore leave population tail risk unresolved. Here we derive sharp bounds on conditional value-at-risk, the average loss in a specified upper tail, for binary outcomes and bounded losses. These bounds span exactly the risks compatible with the observations and a stated limit on how outcome odds differ between observed and hidden cases at the same covariate values. Under stated regularity conditions, calibrated statistical certificates cover these ranges simultaneously across candidate predictors, supporting risk limits and model comparisons while separating statistical uncertainty from persistent ambiguity. For a fixed predictor and loss threshold, we derive a minimum-cost allocation for reducing excess-loss ambiguity by prioritizing hidden outcomes according to ambiguity removed per unit cost. This allocation treats audited population contributions as known and retains the original sensitivity bounds separately for audited and still-hidden outcomes. In controlled masking experiments with known loan repayments, recovering about 16% of hidden labels removes a median 61% of estimated fixed-threshold ambiguity, compared with 16% for random recovery. These results connect population tail-risk claims to the available evidence and identify where additional outcomes can sharpen their assessment.

## Related

- [A note on subadditivity of value at risks (VaRs): A new connection to comonotonicity](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/doi/10-1017-jpr-2025-31/): The research reveals a new characteristic of value at risk (VaR), stating that its subadditivity holds for any confidence level only if the loss random variables are comonotonic.
- [Quantiles under ambiguity and risk sharing](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2412.19546/): The study introduces Choquet Expected Shortfall, a new class of risk measures, and provides optimization algorithms and examples using financial data.
- [Time-Series Foundation AI Model for Value-at-Risk Forecasting](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2410.11773/): The research highlights the superior performance of a time-series model, TimesFM, in forecasting Value-at-Risk, with fine-tuning further enhancing the results.
- [Optimal insurance design with Lambda-Value-at-Risk](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2408.09799/): The paper studies optimal insurance solutions using the Lambda-Value-at-Risk model, revealing that a truncated stop-loss indemnity is ideal under certain conditions and discusses the effect of model uncertainty.
- [Adaptive Multilevel Stochastic Approximation of the Value-at-Risk](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2408.06531/): The paper introduces a multilevel stochastic approximation algorithm that adaptively selects the number of inner samples to compute the value-at-risk of a financial loss, improving the previous scheme's complexity.
- [Risk sharing with lambda value-at-risk under heterogeneous beliefs](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2408.03147/): The research investigates risk distribution among multiple parties using Lambda value at risk, offering formulas for optimal allocations under differing beliefs.