ML-QuantSubscribe

arXivTrading, Microstructure & Execution

Regret Bounds for Market Making with Persistent Orders

A deterministic market-making policy achieves logarithmic regret against fixed quotes and square-root regret against dynamic quotes when orders persist until execution.

Featured in No. 138 on 6 Nov 2026 · 1 day after release

Released
5 Nov 2026
First featured
No. 138 · 6 Nov 2026
Published in
Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
Fanfare
2 of 5
Identifier
arXiv:2611.06159
Authors
Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi et al.

Abstract

From arXiv (CC0).

We study adversarial market making with orders that remain active until execution. The maker operates on two markets: a primary market where orders are made and a secondary market where the resulting positions are hedged. In each round, the maker posts a quote on the primary market before observing both primary and secondary market prices. An order executes when the primary price reaches its quote, and the resulting position is immediately offset at the secondary price. When both price sequences are chosen by an adversary over $T$ rounds, we give a simple deterministic policy with regret of order $\log T$ against the best fixed quote (static comparator) and $\sqrt T$ against the best quote for each submission date (dynamic comparator), plus two terms measuring exposure to future primary and secondary prices. These rates remain optimal even when both exposure terms vanish and lower bounds show that the exposure terms are necessary. Our policy naturally extends to simultaneous bids and asks, where we show that static and dynamic regret are both characterized (up to constant factors) by the exposures terms (where the primary price exposure $V_T^{\mathrm{two}}$ now accounts for both bids and asks) and a term of order $\sqrt{V_T^{\mathrm{two}}\log T}$. Our policy is simple, efficient and fully parameterless. We extend this setting by demonstrating how natural assumptions on the price processes lead to improved guarantees without changing the policy.

Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).

    Type to search. Try rough volatility, LLM agents or FinGPT.

    ↑↓ move↵ openesc closeFull search page