---
title: Regret Bounds for Market Making with Persistent Orders
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2611.06159/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-11-06
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2611.06159
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06159
featured: 2026-11-06
citations: unknown
topic: Trading, Microstructure & Execution
---


# Regret Bounds for Market Making with Persistent Orders

A deterministic market-making policy achieves logarithmic regret against fixed quotes and square-root regret against dynamic quotes when orders persist until execution.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06159
- Identifier: arXiv:2611.06159
- Released: 2026-11-05
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 138 (2026-11-06): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-11-06/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Trading, Microstructure & Execution
- Authors: Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi, Tommaso Cesari, Roberto Colomboni, Luigi Foscari, Vinayak Pathak

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

We study adversarial market making with orders that remain active until execution. The maker operates on two markets: a primary market where orders are made and a secondary market where the resulting positions are hedged. In each round, the maker posts a quote on the primary market before observing both primary and secondary market prices. An order executes when the primary price reaches its quote, and the resulting position is immediately offset at the secondary price. When both price sequences are chosen by an adversary over $T$ rounds, we give a simple deterministic policy with regret of order $\log T$ against the best fixed quote (static comparator) and $\sqrt T$ against the best quote for each submission date (dynamic comparator), plus two terms measuring exposure to future primary and secondary prices. These rates remain optimal even when both exposure terms vanish and lower bounds show that the exposure terms are necessary. Our policy naturally extends to simultaneous bids and asks, where we show that static and dynamic regret are both characterized (up to constant factors) by the exposures terms (where the primary price exposure $V_T^{\mathrm{two}}$ now accounts for both bids and asks) and a term of order $\sqrt{V_T^{\mathrm{two}}\log T}$. Our policy is simple, efficient and fully parameterless. We extend this setting by demonstrating how natural assumptions on the price processes lead to improved guarantees without changing the policy.

## Related

- [Optimal Exit Time for Liquidity Providers in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2509.06510/): The study investigates the best way for a liquidity provider to withdraw liquidity in an automated market, balancing fees and potential losses, and offers insights into dynamic liquidity provision.
- [Optimal Fees for Liquidity Provision in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2508.08152/): The research investigates the earnings of passive liquidity providers in automated markets, suggesting that optimal fees should balance volume attraction and revenue generation, and dynamic fees can enhance results.
- [Performative Market Making](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2508.04344/): The research shows how financial models can shape market processes and influence price changes, enabling market makers to use dominant strategies.
- [Optimal Dynamic Fees in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2506.02869/): The research investigates the best dynamic fees in Automated Market Makers, suggesting fees that are linear in inventory and sensitive to price changes are optimal.
- [Equilibrium Reward for Liquidity Providers in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2503.22502/): The study introduces a model to determine the optimal contract an automated market maker offers to liquidity providers, suggesting that more noise trading encourages providers to add liquidity.
- [Event-Based Limit Order Book Simulation under a Neural Hawkes Process: Application in Market-Making](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2502.17417/): An event-driven Limit Order Book model using a Neural Hawkes process is proposed to simulate high-frequency dynamics in financial markets, offering a more accurate depiction of trade execution.