Penalize the Common Trade: A Collision-Aware Layer for Learned Portfolios

Different learning systems can make nearly the same trade when they share data, objectives, or representations. The market then sees decision concentration even if the models look diverse. We call exposure to this shared direction a signal collision. A linear-impact game shows the basic externality: each allocator chooses too much common exposure because it does not bear the full price effect imposed on others. An overlap-dependent toll recovers the social choice, and a feedback model gives the exact gain at which return-responsive allocation becomes unstable. We also state the restrictive spectral conditions under which a leading eigenportfolio can reveal the collision direction. These results motivate a simple post-model layer: subtract a penalty for loading on the recent common return mode before forming the portfolio. In a frozen panel of ten liquid cross-asset ETFs, 760 completed weeks from January 2012 through July 2026, and exact self-financing costs of 10 basis points per dollar traded, this layer changes maximum drawdown from 23.6% to 14.1%, volatility from 12.6% to 10.7%, and excess-return Sharpe from 0.664 to 0.667. A volatility-matched momentum diagnostic still draws down 19.9%. Paired stationary-bootstrap uncertainty is wide: the 95% interval for drawdown improvement is $[-3.3,18.4]$ percentage points and includes zero. The result establishes a reproducible risk-control association and specifies the holdings-and-flow validation needed to attribute the common direction to AI crowding. AI-use disclosure. Generative AI tools, including OpenAI Codex, assisted manuscript preparation. For this preprint version, Codex assisted with LaTeX editing, author and venue metadata, compilation, and layout checks.

1. 9 Oct 2026

   Conditional value-at-risk under reward-penalty mechanism with applications to robust portfolio management

   Derives a closed-form expression for worst-case conditional value-at-risk under reward-penalty mechanisms and distribution uncertainty, enabling optimal portfolio allocations that balance losses with downside risk.

   arXiv

   1cites
2. 25 Sep 2026

   The Critical Line Algorithm and the Constrained LASSO: One Curve, Two Literatures

   Shows that mean-variance portfolio selection and the constrained LASSO trace identical piecewise-linear solution paths, mapping their parametrizations exactly.

   arXiv

   2cites
3. 25 Sep 2026

   Optimal Investment and Consumption in Financial Markets with Integrated Variance Clocks

   Characterizes optimal consumption and investment strategies in markets with stochastic volatility clocks using infinite-horizon backward SDEs, extending to rough and hyper-rough regimes.

   arXiv

   1cites
4. 16 Jan 2026

   DeePM: Regime-Robust Deep Learning for Systematic Macro Portfolio Management

   Deep Learning for Portfolio Management: DeePM uses deep learning to improve macro portfolio management, delivering better risk-adjusted returns than traditional methods across various economic conditions.

   arXiv

   1cites
5. 28 Dec 2025

   Regulating Cash Holdings: Assessing Lost Returns in Mutual Funds

   Israeli mutual funds hold excessive cash, indicating a need for better liquidity management to reduce redemption risks.

   SSRNFeatured 2×

   3cites
6. 12 Nov 2025

   Effective and Scalable Programs to Facilitate Labor Market Transitions for Women in Technology

   In Poland, cheap online portfolio challenges and one‑on‑one mentoring sharply increased women’s tech employment, and data-driven targeting improved admissions.

   arXiv

   4cites