ML-QuantSubscribe

arXivTrading, Microstructure & Execution

Equilibria and Learning in Competitive Market Making

The research characterizes pure-strategy Nash equilibria for multi-market-maker games, proves equilibria exist under minimal assumptions, and validates theoretical predictions via simulation.

Featured in No. 136 on 23 Oct 2026 · on release day

Profitable boundary deviation at an out-of-support candidate midpoint \widehat{m}\leq\underline{v} . Posting
Figure 3: Profitable boundary deviation at an out-of-support candidate midpoint \widehat{m}\leq\underline{v} . Posting \widetilde{b}_{i}=\underline{v} while withdrawing the ask shifts the induced midpoint to y>\underline{v} , reactivating sell order flow on [\underline{v},y) with a strictly positiv…
Released
23 Oct 2026
First featured
No. 136 · 23 Oct 2026
Published in
Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
Fanfare
2 of 5
Identifier
arXiv:2610.30891
Authors
Matteo Onger and Luigi Foscari

Abstract

From arXiv (CC0).

We propose a market-making game played among $N \ge 2$ strategic market makers and a single non-strategic representative trader. In a continuous quote space, standard finite-game arguments do not apply, while non-convex and discontinuous payoffs rule out classical continuous existence results and complicate learning. Nonetheless, we characterize pure-strategy Nash equilibria (PSNEs) and show that at least one PSNE always exists under minimal assumptions on the underlying asset value distribution, and that the equilibrium bid-ask spread widens strictly with asset value volatility. To obtain a tractable learning framework, we discretize prices and, under an additional regularity condition, show that the time-averaged play of no-internal-regret learners approaches the continuous Nash price envelope as the tick size vanishes. Finally, we empirically validate our theoretical results through numerical simulations.

Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).

    Type to search. Try rough volatility, LLM agents or FinGPT.

    ↑↓ move↵ openesc closeFull search page