---
title: Equilibria and Learning in Competitive Market Making
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2610.30891/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-10-23
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2610.30891
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30891
featured: 2026-10-23
citations: unknown
topic: Trading, Microstructure & Execution
---


# Equilibria and Learning in Competitive Market Making

The research characterizes pure-strategy Nash equilibria for multi-market-maker games, proves equilibria exist under minimal assumptions, and validates theoretical predictions via simulation.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30891
- Identifier: arXiv:2610.30891
- Released: 2026-10-23
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 136 (2026-10-23): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-10-23/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Trading, Microstructure & Execution
- Authors: Matteo Onger, Luigi Foscari

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

We propose a market-making game played among $N \ge 2$ strategic market makers and a single non-strategic representative trader. In a continuous quote space, standard finite-game arguments do not apply, while non-convex and discontinuous payoffs rule out classical continuous existence results and complicate learning. Nonetheless, we characterize pure-strategy Nash equilibria (PSNEs) and show that at least one PSNE always exists under minimal assumptions on the underlying asset value distribution, and that the equilibrium bid-ask spread widens strictly with asset value volatility. To obtain a tractable learning framework, we discretize prices and, under an additional regularity condition, show that the time-averaged play of no-internal-regret learners approaches the continuous Nash price envelope as the tick size vanishes. Finally, we empirically validate our theoretical results through numerical simulations.

## Related

- [Reinforcement Learning for Arbitrage in Decentralized Exchanges](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4708173/): The article presents a game-theory model to explain the tactics of various players in decentralized exchanges with automated market makers.
- [Optimal Exit Time for Liquidity Providers in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2509.06510/): The study investigates the best way for a liquidity provider to withdraw liquidity in an automated market, balancing fees and potential losses, and offers insights into dynamic liquidity provision.
- [Optimal Fees for Liquidity Provision in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2508.08152/): The research investigates the earnings of passive liquidity providers in automated markets, suggesting that optimal fees should balance volume attraction and revenue generation, and dynamic fees can enhance results.
- [Performative Market Making](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2508.04344/): The research shows how financial models can shape market processes and influence price changes, enabling market makers to use dominant strategies.
- [Optimal Dynamic Fees in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2506.02869/): The research investigates the best dynamic fees in Automated Market Makers, suggesting fees that are linear in inventory and sensitive to price changes are optimal.
- [Equilibrium Reward for Liquidity Providers in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2503.22502/): The study introduces a model to determine the optimal contract an automated market maker offers to liquidity providers, suggesting that more noise trading encourages providers to add liquidity.