ML-QuantSubscribe

arXivDerivatives & Volatility

DSINC beyond Heston: the 3/2 and other non-affine stochastic-volatility models

The paper extends damped-sinc methods beyond Heston to general one-factor stochastic-volatility models including the 3/2 and SABR, achieving basis-point accuracy with comparable computational cost.

Featured in No. 136 on 23 Oct 2026 · 1 day after release

Truncated moments for three stochastic volatility models on logarithmic scale
Figure 1: Truncated moments {\mathbb{E}}[(S_{T}/S_{0})^{\chi}] for T=0.5 , computed by the fixed-frequency solver with absorption at the truncation level y_{\max} , on a symmetric logarithmic scale. Parameters as in Section 5.4 .
Released
22 Oct 2026
First featured
No. 136 · 23 Oct 2026
Published in
Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
Fanfare
3 of 5
Identifier
arXiv:2610.28847
Authors
Andrey Itkin

Abstract

From arXiv (CC0).

This paper extends the damped-sinc (DSINC) method for American options beyond the affine Heston class to general one-factor stochastic-volatility models. We show that the collapse identity, which reduces the early-exercise integral to a single spectral integral, remains valid for these models. Damping between zero and one is admissible whenever the discounted spot is a nonnegative local martingale. An Itô transformation of the volatility factorizes the conditional characteristic function and identifies a natural coordinate for approximating the exercise boundary. The 3/2 model admits closed-form joint transforms in terms of Kummer functions, while uncorrelated SABR admits a Bessel representation. When a practical closed-form transform is unavailable, the required volatility integral is computed directly by solving one backward equation per frequency, without a grid in the log-price. Through a known change of volatility coordinate, this approach also accommodates correlated SABR. Tests on the 3/2, SABR, GARCH and lognormal-volatility models show agreement with fine finite-difference benchmarks to within one basis point of the strike. Computational cost is comparable to or lower than that of our finite-difference implementation, except for the slower Hankel implementation of uncorrelated SABR.

Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).

    Type to search. Try rough volatility, LLM agents or FinGPT.

    ↑↓ move↵ openesc closeFull search page