ML-QuantSubscribe

arXivAsset Pricing & Factors

Linguistic Passiveness in Earnings Calls and Stock Returns

Passive-voice fraction in earnings calls predicts temporary mispricings for good news and longer-run underperformance for bad news, independent of standard sentiment measures.

Featured in No. 135 on 16 Oct 2026 · 1 day after release

Simplified matching rules Example
Figure 4 . Simplified matching rules Example
Released
15 Oct 2026
First featured
No. 135 · 16 Oct 2026
Published in
Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
Fanfare
3 of 5
Identifier
arXiv:2610.19087
Authors
Lynn Tao et al.

Abstract

From arXiv (CC0).

We study linguistic passiveness as the fraction of passive-voice sentences in earnings conference call Q&A sessions and show it is informative for equity markets. Using 105,642 U.S. calls from 2008 to 2024, passiveness is negatively associated with announcement-day returns among positive-surprise firms: returns fall from 4.38% to 2.74% across passiveness quintiles. This announcement-day discount fully reverses over the subsequent quarter, indicating a temporary mispricing when news is good. For negative-surprise firms, passiveness has no announcement-day effect but predicts negative long-run returns, consistent with investor under-attention when salient bad news dominates. Passiveness remains informative after controlling for sentiment and standard readability proxies, suggesting that linguistic passiveness captures a distinct yet important dimension of managerial communication.

Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).

    Type to search. Try rough volatility, LLM agents or FinGPT.

    ↑↓ move↵ openesc closeFull search page