Linguistic Passiveness in Earnings Calls and Stock Returns
Passive-voice fraction in earnings calls predicts temporary mispricings for good news and longer-run underperformance for bad news, independent of standard sentiment measures.
Featured in No. 135 on 16 Oct 2026 · 1 day after release

- Released
- 15 Oct 2026
- First featured
- No. 135 · 16 Oct 2026
- Published in
- Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
- Fanfare
- 3 of 5
- Identifier
- arXiv:2610.19087
- Authors
- Lynn Tao et al.
Abstract
From arXiv (CC0).
We study linguistic passiveness as the fraction of passive-voice sentences in earnings conference call Q&A sessions and show it is informative for equity markets. Using 105,642 U.S. calls from 2008 to 2024, passiveness is negatively associated with announcement-day returns among positive-surprise firms: returns fall from 4.38% to 2.74% across passiveness quintiles. This announcement-day discount fully reverses over the subsequent quarter, indicating a temporary mispricing when news is good. For negative-surprise firms, passiveness has no announcement-day effect but predicts negative long-run returns, consistent with investor under-attention when salient bad news dominates. Passiveness remains informative after controlling for sentiment and standard readability proxies, suggesting that linguistic passiveness captures a distinct yet important dimension of managerial communication.
Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).