---
title: Linguistic Passiveness in Earnings Calls and Stock Returns
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2610.19087/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-10-16
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2610.19087
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19087
featured: 2026-10-16
citations: unknown
topic: Asset Pricing & Factors
---


# Linguistic Passiveness in Earnings Calls and Stock Returns

Passive-voice fraction in earnings calls predicts temporary mispricings for good news and longer-run underperformance for bad news, independent of standard sentiment measures.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19087
- Identifier: arXiv:2610.19087
- Released: 2026-10-15
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 135 (2026-10-16): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-10-16/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Asset Pricing & Factors
- Authors: Lynn Tao, Yuntao Wu, Charles Martineau, Vincent Grégoire, Andreas Veneris

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

We study linguistic passiveness as the fraction of passive-voice sentences in earnings conference call Q&A sessions and show it is informative for equity markets. Using 105,642 U.S. calls from 2008 to 2024, passiveness is negatively associated with announcement-day returns among positive-surprise firms: returns fall from 4.38% to 2.74% across passiveness quintiles. This announcement-day discount fully reverses over the subsequent quarter, indicating a temporary mispricing when news is good. For negative-surprise firms, passiveness has no announcement-day effect but predicts negative long-run returns, consistent with investor under-attention when salient bad news dominates. Passiveness remains informative after controlling for sentiment and standard readability proxies, suggesting that linguistic passiveness captures a distinct yet important dimension of managerial communication.

## Related

- [Debt Dictionaries](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/repec/fip-fedpwp-103784/): Stock and bond investors extract different value signals from earnings calls, with bondholders emphasizing operations and risk while equityholders focus on growth and innovation.
- [Measuring What is Repeated and Novel in Earnings Disclosures Using Optimal Transport](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2610.04094/): Decomposing earnings press releases and conference calls into shared and unique textual components shows that unique call content predicts returns better than repeated material.
- [Exogenous Risk, Hedging Pressure, and Risk Premia in Agricultural Commodity Markets](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/repec/ags-aaea26-404411/): Traders place 15% weight on USDA crop reports relative to private priors when forming price expectations, with this anchoring weight rising when private analyst disagreement increases.
- [Interpretable Deep Learning for Stock Returns: A Consensus-Bottleneck Asset Pricing Model](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2512.16251/): The Consensus-Bottleneck Asset Pricing Model uses a neural network to mimic analyst reasoning, showing how investor beliefs influence asset prices and enhancing long-term predictions for U.S. stocks.
- [Deep IV Factor Models](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/5283770/): The Deep Implied Volatility Factor Model, combining neural networks and linear regression, is proposed for estimating the daily Implied Volatility surface of individual stock options, improving performance around earnings announcements.
- [Asset Pricing with Reference-dependent Preferences](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/5269148/): The study suggests that asset prices can be influenced by sentiment-driven preferences, which may explain inconsistencies in stock returns and economic fundamentals.