ML-QuantSubscribe

arXivPortfolio & Allocation

Credal Machine Learning for Risk-Averse Decision Making

A method represents epistemic uncertainty with credal sets and combines them with a decision rule that avoids catastrophic predictions under conditional value-at-risk minimization.

Featured in No. 134 on 9 Oct 2026 · on release day

Set size and accuracy versus corruption severity, showing CreWare adapting set size with degraded accuracy.
Figure 2: Distribution shift on BloodMNIST. Set size and accuracy against shift severity, mean and standard deviation over three seeds. CreWare’s sets grow as accuracy declines, while the baselines’ barely grow.
Released
9 Oct 2026
First featured
No. 134 · 9 Oct 2026
Published in
Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
Fanfare
3 of 5
Identifier
arXiv:2610.12115
Authors
Timo Löhr et al.

Abstract

From arXiv (CC0).

In many machine learning applications, it is necessary to guard against worst-case scenarios and predictions that could result in substantial losses. In principle, this can be achieved by training risk-averse predictive models that minimize loss functions such as conditional value-at-risk (CVaR), rather than relying on models that perform well on average. In practice, however, the effectiveness of this approach to risk aversion is undermined by the learner's uncertainty regarding the true loss distribution and, consequently, the true CVaR. To achieve reliable risk-aversion, we propose a method in which this (epistemic) uncertainty is represented in terms of credal sets, i.e., sets of probability distributions. More specifically, we develop an efficient yet reliable learner that produces predictions in the form of credal sets and combine it with a novel decision rule that maps each credal set to a single predictive distribution for CVaR minimization. Across classification, under distribution shift, and in reinforcement learning, our approach reliably avoids catastrophic decisions, while sacrificing little in expected performance.

Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).

    Type to search. Try rough volatility, LLM agents or FinGPT.

    ↑↓ move↵ openesc closeFull search page