ML-QuantSubscribe

arXivEconometrics & Forecasting

StaFIR: Convex Learning of Stationarity-Aware Causal Filters

A convex method learns causal filters that balance stationarity and input preservation for financial time series, adapting filtering strength to persistence while preserving signal similarity.

Featured in No. 134 on 9 Oct 2026 · 2 days after release

Per-series forecast performance on the log five-day realized-variance series
Figure 5 : Per-series forecast performance on the log five-day realized-variance series. At each forecast horizon h , points report QLIKE relative to raw , in percent. Whiskers are one paired stationary-bootstrap standard error. FD-context , StaFIR-context , and FD(0.5) share the common forecasting…
Released
7 Oct 2026
First featured
No. 134 · 9 Oct 2026
Published in
Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
Fanfare
2 of 5
Identifier
arXiv:2610.07430
Authors
Lorena Egger and Mathis Linger

Abstract

From arXiv (CC0).

Reducing nonstationarity in a persistent time series entails deciding how much of its temporal dependence to remove. In finance, fractional differencing is often tuned using the Augmented Dickey--Fuller (ADF) test, limiting the search to a one-parameter family of lag profiles and addressing input preservation only indirectly. We propose StaFIR, a causal finite-impulse-response filter with a learned nonnegative mixture of exponential lag profiles. Its convex learning objective balances empirical stationarity with similarity to the input. We evaluate StaFIR on ARFIMA--GARCH controlled settings and rolling financial series, including a realized-volatility forecasting task. The experiments show that StaFIR adjusts its filtering strength to persistence while limiting unnecessary transformation in stationary regimes. In downstream forecasting, there is no clear accuracy difference from fixed half-order differencing, while StaFIR achieves higher measured similarity to the raw signal. A complementary direct forecasting experiment finds that greater input similarity is associated with smaller forecasting penalties, although the raw representation remains stronger.

Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).

    Type to search. Try rough volatility, LLM agents or FinGPT.

    ↑↓ move↵ openesc closeFull search page