FactorBench: A Portfolio-Aware Benchmark for Automated Factor Mining
A portfolio-aware benchmark comparing five thousand factors from nine automated mining methods across five equity markets finds that no discovery paradigm consistently dominates in signal quality or portfolio performance.
Featured in No. 134 on 9 Oct 2026 · 2 days after release
- Released
- 7 Oct 2026
- First featured
- No. 134 · 9 Oct 2026
- Published in
- Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
- Fanfare
- 4 of 5
- Identifier
- arXiv:2610.06947
- Authors
- Zhuohan Wang and Carmine Ventre
Abstract
From arXiv (CC0).
Factor mining seeks to discover signals from financial data that predict future asset returns and guide portfolio construction. Automated factor mining now spans genetic programming, reinforcement learning, generative models, and large language model agents. Yet it remains unclear whether advances across these paradigms yield more generalizable, distinct, and economically useful financial signals. We introduce FactorBench, a portfolio-aware benchmark comparing roughly five thousand mined factors from nine automated mining methods across five equity markets. A shared data and evaluation contract supports both symbolic expressions and executable Python factors, connecting heterogeneous discovery algorithms to common signal combination and portfolio construction procedures. FactorBench traces the outputs of mining systems across three levels: factor validity, temporal generalization, and predictiveness beyond measured risk and style exposures; within- and across-method pool distinctness, including similarity to the benchmark Alpha101; and composite-signal quality and after-cost long-only and long--short portfolio performance. After systematically assessing whether advances in factor mining translate into signal quality and portfolio performance, FactorBench finds that no paradigm consistently dominates.
Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).