ML-QuantSubscribe

arXivEconometrics & Forecasting

Tabular Foundation Models in Financial Predictions

A tabular foundation model pretrained on synthetic data outperforms tree-based and language models at predicting next-year earnings changes.

Featured in No. 139 on 13 Nov 2026 · 2 days after release

ROC curves comparing TabFM, Llama, and tree-based models for earnings forecasting performance.
Figure 1. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves This figure compares ROC curves for TabFM, Llama, GBDT-DF, RF, SGB, and GBDT-X. Panel A shows the pooled sample based on 2023 and 2024 financial statements, and Panels B and C show the 2023 and 2024 financial statement years separately. The v…
Released
11 Nov 2026
First featured
No. 139 · 13 Nov 2026
Published in
Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
Fanfare
3 of 5
Identifier
arXiv:2611.13550
Authors
Ed deHaan and Allen H. Huang

Abstract

From arXiv (CC0).

This technical note introduces tabular foundation models (TFMs) to accounting research and evaluates their performance in one common benchmark task: predicting firms' next-year earnings changes. TFMs produce numeric predictions and learn in context, without post-release training or tuning, making them natural and easy to use for forecasting. The TFMs we study are pretrained on synthetic tabular data, so they avoid look-ahead bias from memorizing firms' outcomes. We compare Google Research's TabFM with a fine-tuned open-weight large language model developed in recent accounting research and with several tree-based models. TabFM is more accurate than all comparison models. It is also faster and less computationally intensive than the large language model. Several tree-based specifications produce predictions more quickly than TabFM, so choosing between them involves a trade-off between accuracy and speed. We conclude that TFMs have promise as a new tool for forecasting in accounting and finance. However, our evaluation is based on a single benchmark task, and no class of models is likely to dominate in all settings.

Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).

    Type to search. Try rough volatility, LLM agents or FinGPT.

    ↑↓ move↵ openesc closeFull search page