ML-QuantSubscribe

arXivLLMs & Text

LiveSearch: Questions as Executable Verifier Code for a Live Benchmark of Professional-Source Financial Search Agents

A live benchmark stores financial questions as executable code so answers update daily against real data, preventing memorization and revealing that 70% of daily queries change their correct answer.

Featured in No. 137 on 30 Oct 2026 · 2 days after release

Sankey diagram showing how 109 questions change across evaluation dates, tracking periods, raw values, and gold answers.
Figure 4. From new periods to new answers. All 109 questions over September 14–16, 2026. Band widths count questions and trace the joint paths from reported observation periods to raw values and fixed rendered gold. Sixteen questions acquire a new period without a new raw value; one raw change is h…
Released
28 Oct 2026
First featured
No. 137 · 30 Oct 2026
Published in
Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
Fanfare
3 of 5
Identifier
arXiv:2610.37166
Authors
Sinuo Wang et al.

Abstract

From arXiv (CC0).

In finance, the answer that matters is usually the current one: prices, rates, and disclosures hold only as of a given day, so retrieving up-to-date facts is a core capability of a financial agent. Yet most financial benchmarks overlook timeliness. They fix each answer at annotation time, so the gold goes stale as markets move and, once leaked into training data, rewards recall rather than search and analysis. We introduce LiveSearch, a live benchmark that stores each question as executable verifier code: a typed program of calls to a professional financial data service, followed by a declarative extractor. The question is frozen, while its gold answer is determined by executing the program against professional financial data at evaluation time, and a daily job re-executes it with no human or language model in the loop. A memorized answer is thus likely outdated, and a model must reach the current one through tools and analysis. Construction is equally automatic: a language model only verbalizes programs enumerated from real tool responses and never chooses an answer. Under general web search, six contemporary tool-calling models reach 70.9% to 76.7% answer accuracy. Over three consecutive days, 70% of served questions change their gold value, and even under tolerance-aware matching, a literally reused earlier snapshot fails on a majority of questions within a single day. Per-question tracking uncovers dynamic shifts in correctness masked by aggregate accuracy.

Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).

    Type to search. Try rough volatility, LLM agents or FinGPT.

    ↑↓ move↵ openesc closeFull search page