ML-QuantSubscribe

arXivTrading, Microstructure & Execution

Optimal Size in Market Making under State-Dependent Hawkes Process

A parametric volume model with state-dependent Hawkes order flow and quote-depth multipliers informs optimal placement policies that outperform baseline quoting in realized terms.

Featured in No. 137 on 30 Oct 2026 · 4 days after release

Cumulative intra-day reward comparing five market-making strategies over one trading day.
Figure 11 : Cumulative intra-day reward across the five strategies. The two closed-form policies and the myopic-greedy baseline accumulate in the order of \$10^{5} over the trading day; the trivial, fixed-quote, and retrained policies remain in the order of \$10^{4} .
Released
26 Oct 2026
First featured
No. 137 · 30 Oct 2026
Published in
Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
Fanfare
2 of 5
Identifier
arXiv:2610.31903
Authors
Jonathan Chávez Casillas and Li Gan

Abstract

From arXiv (CC0).

We study market making with a parametric model of executed volume that accounts for quote placement and state-dependent order flow. Executed volume is expressed as the product of an average order size, an exponential demand function, and a Prony-series multiplier depending on quote depth, market-order count constructed from a state-dependent Hawkes model. An approximation result for finite Prony sums on a compact state domain provides a mathematical basis for the representation. An empirical study of limit-order-book data examines the calibrated demand and intensity models, sensitivity to inventory restrictions, and the resulting placement policies. In retrospective evaluations conditional on realised order-flow paths, the selected calibration achieves higher terminal utility than a baseline while respecting the prescribed inventory bound. The comparisons also distinguish the contribution of trading revenues from that of inventory control. The resulting closed-form volume specification takes placement levels as inputs and can therefore be used with alternative quoting rules.

Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).

    Type to search. Try rough volatility, LLM agents or FinGPT.

    ↑↓ move↵ openesc closeFull search page