---
title: Optimal Size in Market Making under State-Dependent Hawkes Process
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2610.31903/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-10-30
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2610.31903
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31903
featured: 2026-10-30
citations: unknown
topic: Trading, Microstructure & Execution
---


# Optimal Size in Market Making under State-Dependent Hawkes Process

A parametric volume model with state-dependent Hawkes order flow and quote-depth multipliers informs optimal placement policies that outperform baseline quoting in realized terms.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31903
- Identifier: arXiv:2610.31903
- Released: 2026-10-26
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 137 (2026-10-30): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-10-30/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Trading, Microstructure & Execution
- Authors: Jonathan Chávez Casillas, Li Gan

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

We study market making with a parametric model of executed volume that accounts for quote placement and state-dependent order flow. Executed volume is expressed as the product of an average order size, an exponential demand function, and a Prony-series multiplier depending on quote depth, market-order count constructed from a state-dependent Hawkes model. An approximation result for finite Prony sums on a compact state domain provides a mathematical basis for the representation. An empirical study of limit-order-book data examines the calibrated demand and intensity models, sensitivity to inventory restrictions, and the resulting placement policies. In retrospective evaluations conditional on realised order-flow paths, the selected calibration achieves higher terminal utility than a baseline while respecting the prescribed inventory bound. The comparisons also distinguish the contribution of trading revenues from that of inventory control. The resulting closed-form volume specification takes placement levels as inputs and can therefore be used with alternative quoting rules.

## Related

- [Event-Based Limit Order Book Simulation under a Neural Hawkes Process: Application in Market-Making](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2502.17417/): An event-driven Limit Order Book model using a Neural Hawkes process is proposed to simulate high-frequency dynamics in financial markets, offering a more accurate depiction of trade execution.
- [Optimal Order Placement under a State-Dependent Hawkes Process Limit Order Book model](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2610.37324/): A dynamic programming framework characterizes inventory-dependent optimal quotes for market makers facing Hawkes-driven order flow, tested on real limit-order-book data.
- [Reinforcement Learning with Hawkes-Structured Networks for Market Making](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2610.16524/): The study proposes a neural network architecture for market making that models self-exciting order arrivals through learnable exponential features and trains via reinforcement learning to optimize quoting policy.
- [Robust Market Making with Hawkes Order Flow and Price Impact via Adversarial Reinforcement Learning](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2609.22785/): The research extends adversarial reinforcement learning for market making to handle self-exciting order arrivals and price impact, using an LSTM module to improve robustness in complex microstructure environments.
- [Optimal Exit Time for Liquidity Providers in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2509.06510/): The study investigates the best way for a liquidity provider to withdraw liquidity in an automated market, balancing fees and potential losses, and offers insights into dynamic liquidity provision.
- [Optimal Fees for Liquidity Provision in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2508.08152/): The research investigates the earnings of passive liquidity providers in automated markets, suggesting that optimal fees should balance volume attraction and revenue generation, and dynamic fees can enhance results.