Distributions or Quantiles? A Convex Variational Theory of Worst-Case Risk
A convex variational theory unifies worst-case risk evaluation across different ambiguity sets, yielding closed-form solutions and algorithms for portfolio selection under Wasserstein and distributional uncertainty.
Featured in No. 136 on 23 Oct 2026 · 1 day after release
![Partial-moment ambiguity with \mu=4 , \sigma=1 , \beta=3 , and admissible support [0,15] . (a) Worst-case CDFs at t=\pm](/issues/2026-10-23/figures/arxiv-14-d2dfae68.png)
- Released
- 22 Oct 2026
- First featured
- No. 136 · 23 Oct 2026
- Published in
- Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
- Fanfare
- 3 of 5
- Identifier
- arXiv:2610.29652
- Authors
- Jianjun Gao et al.
Abstract
From arXiv (CC0).
Worst-case risk evaluation is central to finance and operations research, yet existing analytical results remain fragmented and largely confined to ambiguity sets with specific structures. Using spectral risk measures as the underlying class, we develop a convex variational theory that unifies these analyses and extends them to richer ambiguity models. The theory rests on a representation principle: use the quantile or distribution formulation that preserves convexity of the full ambiguity set. In both representations, the resulting optimality conditions provide a systematic route to identify the worst-case law and determine its risk value. This approach recovers classical central-moment bounds and yields closed-form or semi-closed-form solutions for practically motivated models involving Wasserstein ambiguity with tail stress, two-sided expected shortfall (ES) bands, asymmetric partial moments, geometric-moment bounds, and exponential- or Gaussian-reference Kullback--Leibler (KL) neighborhoods. Beyond these analytical results, the same theory yields projection-based algorithms with fixed-grid convergence under the stated assumptions. In a high-dimensional portfolio application, we establish an exact projection identity for mean-anchored joint KL ambiguity under a Gaussian reference. The resulting standardized worst-case ES coefficient applies to every portfolio, reducing robust portfolio selection to an exact second-order cone program after a single calibration.
Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).