ML-QuantSubscribe

arXivTrading, Microstructure & Execution

Adversarial Post-Training of Foundation Models for High-Frequency Trading

Wasserstein GAN post-training on limit order book foundation models cuts error accumulation and improves realism by 17%, outperforming continued pre-training with far lower compute cost.

Featured in No. 136 on 23 Oct 2026 · 3 days after release

The limit order book and its message stream from records in LOBSTER format
Figure 2. The limit order book and its message stream from records in LOBSTER format. Bar length represents volume. A limit order book drawn as bid and ask volume bars at each price level. Example messages (a cancellation, an execution and a new limit order) point to the levels they change, and a l…
Released
20 Oct 2026
First featured
No. 136 · 23 Oct 2026
Published in
Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
Fanfare
3 of 5
Identifier
arXiv:2610.25604
Authors
Alexandre Bismuth et al.

Abstract

From arXiv (CC0).

While autoregressive foundation models trained on limit order book (LOB) data show state-of-the-art performance for market simulation, pre-training with cross-entropy neither penalizes the compounding of sampling errors over free-running rollouts nor targets desired market properties. We introduce a post-training method for LOB foundation models using a Wasserstein generative adversarial network (GAN) objective. A critic, trained online on rollouts through the true, non-differentiable matching engine, guides updates from evolution strategies over rank-4 LoRA perturbations of the pre-trained generator, under a KL trust region. For efficiency, we use EGGROLL (Evolution Guided GeneRal Optimisation via Low-rank Learning), a memory-efficient variant of evolution strategies. On a held-out panel, adversarial post-training improves LOB-Bench realism by 17.6% (WS-21) and 17.0% (Mean-$L_1$), while selection-matched random-perturbation and compute-matched continued-pre-training controls yield no improvement. Post-training is thus a necessary stage that more pre-training does not replace. Per-position divergence measurements show that it slows error accumulation over 500-message rollouts from $3.1\times$ to $2.3\times$. Adversarial post-training is also inexpensive, requiring under 50M training tokens and 12 GPU-hours per seed, three orders of magnitude below the 48B-token pre-training budget. Ablations over critic inputs, optimizers, and the population-rollout trade-off, together with an analysis of reward hacking, yield practical design guidelines for adversarial post-training.

Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).

    Type to search. Try rough volatility, LLM agents or FinGPT.

    ↑↓ move↵ openesc closeFull search page