ML-QuantSubscribe

arXivCrypto & DeFi

Market Efficiency in a Changing Asset Population: Mobility, Entry, and Survival over Cryptocurrency's Full History

Testing weak-form efficiency on 8,970 cryptocurrencies over thirteen years, the study finds persistent asymmetry in market ranking but reveals that neglected assets lack liquidity rather than predictability.

Featured in No. 136 on 23 Oct 2026 · 4 days after release

Cumulative wealth from $1 invested in: the paper strategy (equal-weighted bottom decile of surviving coins, weekly
Figure 2: Cumulative wealth from $1 invested in: the paper strategy (equal-weighted bottom decile of surviving coins, weekly rebalancing); the investable bottom decile (volume screen of $10,000, delisting treated as -100\% , one-way costs of 2% on turnover, cash in untradable weeks); and the value-…
Released
19 Oct 2026
First featured
No. 136 · 23 Oct 2026
Published in
Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
Fanfare
3 of 5
Identifier
arXiv:2610.23283
Authors
Antonis Ballis and Christos Ioannidis

Abstract

From arXiv (CC0).

Weak-form efficiency implies symmetry restrictions on the Markov chain governing movement across the cryptocurrency capitalisation distribution. We test them on the full listed population: 8,970 assets, 690 weekly cross-sections, 2013 to 2026, with entry, exit and survival observed rather than inferred. Symmetry is rejected in every era, but the asymmetry falls by seventy percent, and what converged is entry-driven compositional churn rather than coins' own valuations. The bottom decile earns 27.5% per week on paper and nothing among assets that trade, on capacity of $293,000. Compensation for neglect exists precisely where trading does not.

Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).

    Type to search. Try rough volatility, LLM agents or FinGPT.

    ↑↓ move↵ openesc closeFull search page