ML-QuantSubscribe

arXivTrading, Microstructure & Execution

Modelling Regime Shifts in Continuous Intraday Electricity Markets with State-dependent Hawkes Processes

A regime-switching Hawkes process models intraday electricity order flow across liquidity conditions, showing that stress mainly strengthens self-excitation rather than reshaping cross-side dynamics.

Featured in No. 134 on 9 Oct 2026 · 2 days after release

Intraday electricity market evolution: mid-price, bid-ask spread, and trading volume over time.
Fig. 2: Intraday evolution of the XBID market for the delivery hour 20:00–21:00 on the 16th of January 2024. The top panel shows the mid-price trajectory in euros, the middle panel displays the bid-ask spread, and the bottom panel displays the total volume of active orders in the LOB, computed as t…
Released
7 Oct 2026
First featured
No. 134 · 9 Oct 2026
Published in
Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
Fanfare
2 of 5
Identifier
arXiv:2610.08169
Authors
Ayoub Jhabli et al.

Abstract

From arXiv (CC0).

The growing importance of intraday trading in Europe, driven by the increasing penetration of renewable energy sources, has led to higher volatility and periods of market stress. Understanding how order flow behaves under varying liquidity conditions requires models that adapt to the state of the market. This paper proposes a multivariate state-dependent Hawkes process to model the flow of orders across different liquidity regimes in the intraday continuous electricity market. The observed market states are identified using a proposed Liquidity Stress Index (LSI), which quantifies stress using the bid-ask spread in the limit order book, order book volume, and mid-price volatility. Transitions between states induce changes in the intensity parameters, resulting in piecewise dynamics that reflect regime-specific order-flow behavior. The model is calibrated on January-March 2024 Dutch intraday continuous cross-border intraday (XBID) hourly order data from EPEX SPOT. The estimated dynamics show that order flow is strongly self-exciting and near-critical, that executed trades trigger new same-side orders while the reverse effect is negligible, and that liquidity stress mainly strengthens transaction self-excitation rather than reshaping the cross-side structure. Robustness checks over the LSI composition and the state partition show that the results are driven by the regime construction itself: alternative index compositions fit within a narrow band, three states fit better than two, and removing the states clearly degrades the fit relative to a single-regime Hawkes benchmark. The results highlight both the value of conditioning order-flow models on liquidity stress and the limits of a single-exponential specification when event frequencies are highly imbalanced.

Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).

    Type to search. Try rough volatility, LLM agents or FinGPT.

    ↑↓ move↵ openesc closeFull search page