MintEval: Do LLMs Implement the Trading Strategy You Asked For? A Behavioural-Equivalence Benchmark for Natural-Language-to-Strategy Code

Large language models are moving from producing trading signals to writing the code that executes them. The failure mode of the second role is silent: generated code runs, a backtest plots, yet the risk logic that the trader described is not the logic being executed. Existing code benchmarks test functional correctness on unit tests and finance benchmarks test forecasting; neither measures whether an implementation behaves like the strategy that was asked for. We introduce MintEval, a benchmark in which reference strategies are generated programmatically from a library of composable building blocks, back-translated into colloquial trader instructions, and re-implemented by the model under test. Generated and reference programs are executed bar by bar on identical market data and frictions, and compared on their actions rather than on code similarity or profit: alpha is differenced away. MintEval v0 contains 800 tasks on BTCUSDT 15-minute data, stratified by an execution-measured state-span complexity tau that is decoupled from description length. Low-cost models reach a mean ActionMatch of at most 0.544 and reproduce at most 0.087 of tasks exactly; on a stratified subset of 200 tasks a frontier model (Claude Opus 5.5) reaches 0.889 and reproduces 0.575 exactly, yet still fails silently on 0.275 of tasks. Given a menu of building blocks, models identify the strategy almost perfectly, yet 79.2% of the implementations whose specification was read correctly diverge on more than 10% of active bars. The LLM judge of a recent strategy-generation benchmark, applied verbatim, accepts every one of these silent failures.

1. 14 May 2025

   Can LLM-based Financial Investing Strategies Outperform the Market in Long Run?

   FINSABER, a backtesting framework, shows that Large Language Models' effectiveness in stock trading decreases over longer periods and larger symbol universes, emphasizing the need for trend detection and risk controls.

   arXivIn Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.1

   29cites
2. 23 Apr 2025

   The Memorization Problem: Can We Trust LLMs'Economic Forecasts?

   The study shows that large language models can remember exact economic figures from before their knowledge cutoff dates, which may skew their predictive abilities in forecasting and backtesting trading strategies.

   arXiv

   40cites
3. 4 Oct 2023

   Look-Ahead Bias in Stock Return Predictions

   Large language models like ChatGPT can generate profitable trading signals from news sentiment, but backtesting can yield biased results due to overlapping periods.

   SSRN

   5shares
4. 7 Aug 2024

   Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters

   The research investigates enhancing Large Language Models' (LLMs) performance using more test-time computation, suggesting a compute-optimal scaling strategy based on prompt difficulty.

   Machine learning

   2,266cites
5. 24 Jul 2024

   AWQ: Activation-aware Weight Quantization for On-Device LLM Compression and Acceleration

   The study suggests Activation-aware Weight Quantization (AWQ), a hardware-friendly method for quantizing large language models that reduces error and improves performance on various benchmarks.

   Machine learningIn GetMobile: Mobile Computing and Communications

   1,914cites
6. 12 Dec 2024

   Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling

   The paper presents InternVL 2.5, a sophisticated multimodal large language model that performs well on various benchmarks, exceeding 70% on the MMMU benchmark.

   Machine learning

   1,802cites