ML-QuantSubscribe

arXivPortfolio & Allocation

Multiperiod bond portfolio optimization with transaction costs using a Markov Decision process

The study develops a Markov decision process framework for dynamic bond portfolio management that balances yield and interest-rate risk subject to transaction costs.

Featured in No. 133 on 2 Oct 2026 · 1 day after release

Simulation of Yields of 5 Year Bond over six months using the Markov Chain Approximation with a 40 bps discretization
Figure 1 : Simulation of Yields of 5 Year Bond over six months using the Markov Chain Approximation with a 40 bps discretization.
Released
1 Oct 2026
First featured
No. 133 · 2 Oct 2026
Published in
Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
Fanfare
2 of 5
Identifier
arXiv:2609.38765
Authors
Balaji Ramachandran et al.

Abstract

From arXiv (CC0).

Bank treasury portfolios must balance yield, liquidity, and interest-rate risk across bonds of different maturities. Static allocation rules are ill-suited to this task: portfolios concentrated in long-duration securities with no dynamic adjust- ment mechanism can accumulate large mark-to-market losses and liquidity stress under rising interest rates, as illustrated by the failure of Silicon Valley Bank in 2023. We develop a tractable simulation-based framework for multi-period bond port- folio optimization under interest-rate risk and proportional transaction costs. Yield-curve dynamics are modeled using the Dynamic Nelson-Siegel parameter- ization with Vector Autoregressive factor dynamics, from which we construct a time-inhomogeneous discrete-state Markov chain approximating the joint yield process across bond maturities. This chain forms the state space of a finite- horizon Markov Decision Process in which the investor maximizes expected terminal wealth subject to proportional rebalancing costs. The optimal portfolio policy is obtained by backward induction. We also quantify the approximation error introduced by truncating the transition kernel, and show that it leaves mean terminal wealth almost unchanged while substantially distorting drawdown and tail statistics.

Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).

    Type to search. Try rough volatility, LLM agents or FinGPT.

    ↑↓ move↵ openesc closeFull search page