ML-QuantSubscribe

arXivPortfolio & Allocation

Active Portfolio Management in Concentrated Equity Markets

Formulates a stochastic control problem for actively allocating between equal-weighted and market portfolios based on a diversity-dispersion model, outperforming passive strategies during market bubbles.

Featured in No. 132 on 25 Sep 2026 · 1 day after release · 0 citations today

Top row: A simulated path of market diversity and dispersion under the calibrated mean-reverting SDD model (left), and
Figure 7. Top row: A simulated path of market diversity and dispersion under the calibrated mean-reverting SDD model (left), and the resulting frictionless target \lambda_{0}^{*} and frictional optimal tilt \lambda^{*} (right). Bottom row: The cumulative unpenalized log relative values (left) and p…
Released
24 Sep 2026
First featured
No. 132 · 25 Sep 2026
Citations (Semantic Scholar)
0
Influential citations
0
Published in
Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
Fanfare
3 of 5
Identifier
arXiv:2609.27113
Authors
Brian Ceco et al.

Abstract

From arXiv (CC0).

The equal-weighted portfolio is a passive, rule-based strategy that has historically been difficult to outperform, delivering higher returns than the capitalization-weighted "market" benchmark across many markets and periods. Stochastic portfolio theory (SPT) reveals that this relative performance is regime dependent, with the equal-weighted portfolio underperforming during periods of increasing market concentration and high correlations, particularly market bubbles. These observations have motivated us to formulate and solve a stochastic control problem in which an investor actively allocates between the equal-weighted and market portfolios. The investor bases their allocation decisions on forecasts made under a flexible stochastic diversity--dispersion (SDD) model. Using a quadratic surrogate for implementation frictions, we characterize the optimal allocation through a linear forward--backward SDE and obtain an explicit "aiming in front of a moving target'' representation of the optimal trading rate, in the spirit of Gârleanu and Pedersen. The penalty parameters are calibrated in sample to match the cumulative wealth effect of proportional transaction costs, while out-of-sample performance is evaluated with those costs deducted directly from portfolio wealth. Using historical S&P 500 data, we show that a mean-reverting SDD specification reproduces several empirical features of market diversity and dispersion. In out-of-sample backtests from 1995 to 2024, the resulting strategies deliver higher cumulative net returns than both the equal-weighted and market portfolios, and higher information ratios than the equal-weighted portfolio after 15-basis-point proportional transaction costs.

Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).

    Type to search. Try rough volatility, LLM agents or FinGPT.

    ↑↓ move↵ openesc closeFull search page