ML-QuantSubscribe

arXivTrading, Microstructure & Execution

Calibration of Passive Market Impact with a Queue-Sensitive Propagator Model

A framework decomposing price into universal propagator and queue-sensitive corrections improves model fit and predicts passive limit-order impact better than classical propagator models.

Featured in No. 137 on 30 Oct 2026 · on release day

Queue sensitivity function showing decay with confidence bands and model fits.
Figure 6 : Sensitivity \kappa(q) against the best queue (AES units): sum-of-powers fit with a two-standard-error band, and affine and logarithmic fits. Dotted lines: median and 99 th percentile of the queue found by trades.
Released
30 Oct 2026
First featured
No. 137 · 30 Oct 2026
Published in
Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
Fanfare
2 of 5
Identifier
arXiv:2610.38442
Authors
Yadh Hafsi et al.

Abstract

From arXiv (CC0).

We develop a framework for calibrating passive market impact, defined as the price response to liquidity-providing limit orders, in contrast to the impact of liquidity-consuming market orders. We build on the model of Ouazzani Chahdi, Rosenbaum, and Szymanski (arxiv:2412.07461), which combines Hawkes-driven market-order flow with queue-reactive limit-order and cancellation dynamics. Within this model, we show that the price decomposes into a universal propagator term driven by signed order-flow imbalance and a state-dependent correction that captures the dependence of price sensitivity on volume at the best quotes. This decomposition links limit-order-book microstructure to standard propagator models and yields a regression on two observable signals: the propagator signal and the queue-weighted order-flow imbalance. We calibrate the model on high-frequency order-book data and find that the passive-impact term explains substantial variation in prices beyond the classical propagator, improving both model fit and the accuracy of predicted impact curves.

Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).

    Type to search. Try rough volatility, LLM agents or FinGPT.

    ↑↓ move↵ openesc closeFull search page