ML-QuantSubscribe

arXivRisk, Credit & Banking

Contemporaneous Transmission Networks and Systemic Risk in European Banking

Using recursive network analysis of equity returns, the research identifies distinct transmitting and receiving roles among European banks and constructs measures of systemic impact and vulnerability.

Featured in No. 137 on 30 Oct 2026 · 2 days after release

Systemic risk quadrant map: banks plotted by impact score versus vulnerability score, sized by market cap.
Figure 8: Systemic impact versus systemic vulnerability. Marker size increases with market capitalization, and dashed lines are the sample medians. All banks are labeled and grouped descriptively by the two median thresholds. Scores are sensitivities on the filtered-return scale, not expected losse…
Released
28 Oct 2026
First featured
No. 137 · 30 Oct 2026
Published in
Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
Fanfare
3 of 5
Identifier
arXiv:2610.37487
Authors
Minh Duc Duong et al.

Abstract

From arXiv (CC0).

We study how contemporaneous equity-return transmission shapes systemic exposure among 51 listed European banks. Using a recursive non-Gaussian network model on volatility-standardized returns, we construct two market-capitalization-weighted measures based on direct and indirect transmission effects: the Systemic Impact Score (SIS), capturing a bank's potential influence on other institutions, and the Systemic Vulnerability Score (SVS), capturing its exposure to disturbances originating elsewhere. The fitted network reveals distinct transmitting and receiving roles, highlighting differences between institutions with substantial outward influence and those with high incoming sensitivity. Receiving roles are generally more reproducible than transmitting roles across repeated network discovery, and selected connections remain informative about lower-tail dependence in subsequent observations. Volatility standardization substantially reduces detected dependence among recovered shocks, although the full-sample model does not satisfy the designated criterion for supporting shock independence. Alternative recursive orderings also yield comparable directional tail asymmetries, limiting the extent to which these patterns validate a particular ordering. The results provide complementary measures of model-implied systemic transmission and vulnerability, with explicit attention to uncertainty and identification limits

Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).

    Type to search. Try rough volatility, LLM agents or FinGPT.

    ↑↓ move↵ openesc closeFull search page