arXivCrypto & DeFi
The Term Structure of Implied Fee Rates in Liquidity Pools
A no-arbitrage framework recovers implied fee rates for liquidity providers in Uniswap pools, revealing time-varying and maturity-dependent compensation that varies significantly with pool design.
Featured in No. 137 on 30 Oct 2026 · 2 days after release
- Released
- 28 Oct 2026
- First featured
- No. 137 · 30 Oct 2026
- Published in
- Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
- Fanfare
- 3 of 5
- Identifier
- arXiv:2610.36392
- Authors
- Diogo Duarte et al.
Abstract
From arXiv (CC0).
We develop a no-arbitrage framework to recover implied fee rates from option-implied information and quantify fee compensation for liquidity providers in automated market maker (AMM) pools. Expected accumulated fees equal the current pool value minus the risk-neutral value of its terminal payoff, reducing forward-looking LP compensation to pricing the LP payoff. We apply the framework to Uniswap v2 and Uniswap v3 ETH--USDC pools using a stochastic-volatility jump-diffusion model calibrated to Deribit options. Implied fee rates are positive, time varying, downward sloping in maturity, and highly sensitive to range design, with tighter near-the-money ranges earning larger implied returns.
Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).