---
title: Backtesting High-Dimensional Expected Shortfall
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2611.13882/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-11-14
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2611.13882
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13882
featured: 2026-11-13
citations: unknown
topic: Risk, Credit & Banking
---


# Backtesting High-Dimensional Expected Shortfall

Orthogonal methods remove bias in downside-risk backtests when estimating high-dimensional Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall forecasts.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13882
- Identifier: arXiv:2611.13882
- Released: 2026-11-11
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 139 (2026-11-13): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-11-13/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Risk, Credit & Banking
- Authors: Zaichao Du, Juan Carlos Escanciano, Pei Pei

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

Forecast evaluation increasingly uses high-dimensional predictors, but estimation and regularization of large predictive models can distort conventional backtests. This issue is particularly important for forecasting downside risk, where the signal-to-noise ratio is low. We develop out-of-sample Expected Shortfall (ES) backtests that remove the large first-order bias effects of estimating high-dimensional Value-at-Risk, ES, and the evaluation instrument. In a linear ES specification, the proposed methods are easily implemented as Double Lasso with a tail-size-adjusted score as a generated dependent variable. More generally, we characterize orthogonal ES backtesting moments, and establish oracle equivalence and valid inference under time-series dependence and repeated estimation with overlapping and expanding training windows. Simulations show that conventional backtests can severely overreject ES optimal forecasts, whereas orthogonalization improves size control. An application to downside-growth forecasting for G7 economies finds evidence against a US growth-only ES specification, even though forecast-oriented regularization selects no additional financial predictors. The application also shows that accounting for estimation can change rejection decisions in either direction. These findings highlight the distinct roles of predictive variable selection and backtesting in the evaluation of high-dimensional tail-risk models.

## Related

- [When Backtests Lie: A Governance-Grade Validation Framework for Machine-Learning Value-at-Risk Models under Regime Shifts](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/7652318/): The study shows that machine-learning VaR models passing standard backtests breach risk limits two to nine times worse in stressed regimes, revealing false comfort in current regulatory validation.
- [E-Backtesting Expected Shortfall without Value-at-Risk Forecasts under Time-series Models](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2610.17681/): Sequential backtests for Expected Shortfall using only observed losses and ES forecasts control false rejections, with time-series extension under AR-GARCH structure proving convergent under grid refinement.
- [A note on subadditivity of value at risks (VaRs): A new connection to comonotonicity](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/doi/10-1017-jpr-2025-31/): The research reveals a new characteristic of value at risk (VaR), stating that its subadditivity holds for any confidence level only if the loss random variables are comonotonic.
- [Quantiles under ambiguity and risk sharing](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2412.19546/): The study introduces Choquet Expected Shortfall, a new class of risk measures, and provides optimization algorithms and examples using financial data.
- [Time-Series Foundation AI Model for Value-at-Risk Forecasting](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2410.11773/): The research highlights the superior performance of a time-series model, TimesFM, in forecasting Value-at-Risk, with fine-tuning further enhancing the results.
- [Optimal insurance design with Lambda-Value-at-Risk](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2408.09799/): The paper studies optimal insurance solutions using the Lambda-Value-at-Risk model, revealing that a truncated stop-loss indemnity is ideal under certain conditions and discusses the effect of model uncertainty.