---
title: Do Time-Series Foundation Models Forecast Index-Futures Returns? A Preregistered Evaluation of Models, Metrics, and Input Representations
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2611.12141/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-11-14
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2611.12141
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.12141
featured: 2026-11-13
citations: unknown
topic: Econometrics & Forecasting
---


# Do Time-Series Foundation Models Forecast Index-Futures Returns? A Preregistered Evaluation of Models, Metrics, and Input Representations

A pre-registered evaluation finds zero evidence that five frozen time-series foundation models beat a no-change forecast on index futures returns across 160 tests.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.12141
- Identifier: arXiv:2611.12141
- Released: 2026-11-10
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 139 (2026-11-13): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-11-13/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Econometrics & Forecasting
- Authors: Rishabh Upadhyay

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

We ask whether the apparent forecasting skill of frozen time-series foundation models (TSFMs) on intraday index-futures returns is incremental skill. In a pre-registered evaluation on E-mini Nasdaq-100 (NQ) and E-mini S&P 500 (ES) futures, a common panel of five zero-shot models (Chronos-Bolt, Chronos-2, TimesFM 2.5, Moirai 2.0 and TiRex), plus separate experiments with Kronos, is compared with a no-change forecast at 5-120 minutes, using native prices, log returns, volatility-standardised returns and a volume clock as inputs. On a blind set opened once, 0 of 160 model-representation-horizon-market cells beat no-change, and a Hansen SPA test gives p = 1.000 on both markets; a later retrospective hold-out, scored as a descriptive check, gives 0 of 120. Input representations change forecast magnitude but not accuracy, and a transformation-aware ridge regression does as well. Several standard measures nevertheless suggest skill. Price-level correlation exceeds 0.9996, but no-change scores higher. Within-day RankIC across forecast origins rewards a trivial revert-to-mean rule (+0.35 at 30 minutes); we derive the expected within-day covariance under a random walk in closed form, and a sign-randomised null reproduces about 95% of the observed value. One model beats HAR for 5-minute volatility, but not the EWMA its input already contains. On strongly planted synthetic signals the models recover part of the signal at 5 minutes, and recovery deteriorates at 30 minutes. Benchmark-level success of TSFMs should therefore not be assumed to carry over to low-signal domains such as intraday returns.

## Related

- [FinCast: A Foundation Model for Financial Time-Series Forecasting](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2508.19609/): Time-Series Forecasting Model: FinCast, a new model for financial time-series forecasting, outperforms existing methods by effectively capturing diverse patterns without needing domain-specific adjustments.
- [Tabular Foundation Models in Financial Predictions](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2611.13550/): A tabular foundation model pretrained on synthetic data outperforms tree-based and language models at predicting next-year earnings changes.
- [TKAN: Temporal Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4825654/): The article presents Temporal Kolomogorov-Arnold Networks (TKANs), a new neural network design that merges the benefits of Recurrent Neural Networks and Long Short-Term Memory for improved multistep time series forecasting.
- [Deep learning models for price forecasting of financial time series: A review of recent advancements: 2020–2022](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2305.04811/): The article explores deep learning models for financial forecasting, discussing their structures, uses, pros and cons, and potential future research areas.
- [Robust agents learn causal world models](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2402.10877/): The research suggests that intelligent agents must learn an approximate causal model to generalize to new domains, impacting fields like transfer learning and causal inference.
- [Directional-shift Dirichlet ARMA models for compositional time series with structural break intervention](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2601.16821/): The article introduces a new Bayesian model that analyzes compositional time series data, effectively handling structural breaks and enhancing forecasting accuracy during these changes.