---
title: FirstSwap: Pre-Consensus Trade Approvals for Decentralized Market Design
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2611.10254/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-11-14
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2611.10254
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10254
featured: 2026-11-13
citations: unknown
topic: Crypto & DeFi
---


# FirstSwap: Pre-Consensus Trade Approvals for Decentralized Market Design

Introduces FirstSwap, a decentralized exchange giving traders early price guarantees before consensus via a scaled admissibility protocol, improving welfare and reducing arbitrage losses.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10254
- Identifier: arXiv:2611.10254
- Released: 2026-11-10
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 139 (2026-11-13): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-11-13/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Crypto & DeFi
- Authors: William Diamond, Fatima Elsheimy, Dahlia Malkhi, Geoff Ramseyer, Srivatsan Sridhar

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

Decentralized exchanges typically give traders no execution guarantee until a block is finalized. In the meantime, external prices move, traders strategically delay submission, and block producers can influence inclusion and ordering. We introduce FirstSwap, a DEX built on a constant-function market maker pricing curve that gives traders an early pre-approval before consensus, guaranteeing inclusion and execution within their submitted price limit, with final ordering determined by limit prices rather than by a block producer. We demonstrate the benefits of trade pre-approvals in an economic model combining auction theory with CEX-DEX arbitrage. When the CEX price changes gradually, FirstSwap rewards earlier traders with better prices, discouraging strategic delay and yielding higher social welfare and gains to AMM liquidity providers than a batch auction. When the CEX price jumps abruptly, FirstSwap yields higher welfare and smaller AMM losses than fair ordering. The central challenge is delivering fast trade pre-approvals without consensus. We introduce a decentralized, scaled admissibility protocol under which each validator reserves only a fraction of the available liquidity at every price. A trader obtains approval in a single round of messages with a quorum of validators. Somewhat surprisingly, despite Byzantine validators who may approve trades arbitrarily, we show that all quorum-certified trades are jointly admissible and execute within their limits. Our protocol extends naturally to a setting where buy and sell orders can be pre-approved against each other before a block is finalized.

## Related

- [A theoretical framework for fees in AMMs](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2404.03976/): The study explores the workings of arbitrage in decentralized finance automated market makers (AMMs), aiming to understand how AMMs can optimize revenue or minimize losses, and models the dynamics of arbitrage activity.
- [Decentralised Finance and Automated Market Making: Predictable Loss and Optimal Liquidity Provision](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2309.08431/): The study outlines the wealth dynamics of strategic liquidity providers in constant product markets, proposes an optimal liquidity provision strategy, and uses Uniswap v3 data to show its effectiveness.
- [Axioms for Automated Market Makers: A Mathematical Framework in FinTech and Decentralized Finance](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2210.01227/): Mathematical Framework: The research introduces a new framework for Automated Market Makers, suggesting a unique fee structure and a novel AMM that reduces divergence loss.
- [Learning from DeFi: Would Automated Market Makers Improve Equity Trading?](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4531670/): The study suggests that optimally designed automated market makers could potentially save U.S. investors billions in transaction costs each year.
- [Decentralised Finance and Automated Market Making: Execution and Speculation](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4144743/): The study investigates automated market makers, particularly constant product market makers, and develops two optimal trading strategies using stochastic optimal control tools, as demonstrated with Uniswap v3 data.
- [The Term Structure of Implied Fee Rates in Liquidity Pools](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2610.36392/): A no-arbitrage framework recovers implied fee rates for liquidity providers in Uniswap pools, revealing time-varying and maturity-dependent compensation that varies significantly with pool design.