---
title: The Logic of Factor Portfolios: Boolean Rules, Interactions, and Trading Costs
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2611.09834/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-11-14
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2611.09834
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09834
featured: 2026-11-13
citations: unknown
topic: Portfolio & Allocation
---


# The Logic of Factor Portfolios: Boolean Rules, Interactions, and Trading Costs

Walsh decomposition reveals how interactions among signals drive turnover and persistence; most single-signal portfolios beat quoted spreads but few multi-signal combinations do.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09834
- Identifier: arXiv:2611.09834
- Released: 2026-11-09
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 139 (2026-11-13): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-11-13/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Portfolio & Allocation
- Authors: Ziyao Wang, Svetlozar T. Rachev, Frank J. Fabozzi

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

Investors turn signals into holdings through decision rules: buy the top decile, hold stocks with high momentum and low volatility, exclude stocks that fail a screen. Many such rules are Boolean functions of threshold statements about signal ranks, and writing them this way shows both what a rule holds and how often it trades. A Walsh decomposition splits the return of any rule into exposures to individual signals and to interactions among signals; an intersection and a union of the same two screens, for example, have opposite interaction exposures. The same coefficients, together with the persistence of the underlying statements, determine turnover. Interactions are less persistent than their components, so rules that load on higher-order interactions trade more, and thresholds discard information, so at equal risk threshold implementations of interactions trade more than smooth ones. In U.S. stocks from 1973 to 2024, these predictions hold closely: predicted and realized persistence have correlations of at least 0.999, predicted turnover matches realized turnover with a slope of 1.02, and the same interactions are more persistent as products of ranks than as threshold rules. Trading costs rise with order, and because premia fall with order, 58% of single-signal portfolios have absolute premia above their quoted-spread costs over 1995-2024, against 24% of two-signal and 6% of three-signal interaction portfolios. Out of sample, interaction portfolios raise the Sharpe ratio of single-signal tangency portfolios, and over 1995-2024 they reject a six-factor model that conventional sorts on the same signals do not reject.

## Related

- [Winners vs. Losers: Momentum-based Strategies with Intertemporal Choice for ESG Portfolios](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2505.24250/): The study introduces a new momentum framework that adjusts to changing ESG sentiment, showing that portfolios with poor ESG performance outperform those with good ESG performance in pro-ESG regimes due to market overreaction, challenging traditional ESG investment beliefs.
- [Beat the Market: An Effective Intraday Momentum Strategy for S&P500 ETF (SPY)](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4824172/): The study investigates the success of an intraday momentum strategy on SPY, an ETF tracking the SP500, which resulted in a 1985 total return from 2007 to 2024.
- [Timing the Tide: The Impact of Rebalancing Periods in Momentum Investing in Indian Equities](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4687044/): Shorter rebalancing periods are more effective in capturing academic momentum in portfolios, a study on portfolio sizes, weighting schemes, and rebalancing intervals reveals.
- [TrendFolios: A Portfolio Construction Framework for Utilizing Momentum and Trend-Following In a Multi-Asset Portfolio](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2506.09330/): The study presents a portfolio construction framework using momentum and trend-following signals across various asset classes, showing its potential to generate excess returns and manage risk over 22 years.
- [Mutual Funds and Asset Pricing Anomalies](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4918275/): The anomalies in stock returns, specifically low-risk and momentum, are due to demand pressure from mutual funds, especially those with high-beta assets.
- [Why not low turnover instead of 50/50 for strategic rebalancing ?](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4723034/): A low turnover portfolio, slowly readjusted to fixed weights, performs better than the standard equities/bonds portfolio and is a viable alternative to a simple momentum or value portfolio.