---
title: Predicting Factor Decay: ML Models for Cross-Factor Predictability Erosion
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2611.03668/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-11-06
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2611.03668
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03668
featured: 2026-11-06
citations: unknown
topic: Asset Pricing & Factors
---


# Predicting Factor Decay: ML Models for Cross-Factor Predictability Erosion

Machine learning models predict when cross-factor predictability will erode, achieving high C-index on held-out pairs and finding that stronger signals decay faster.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03668
- Identifier: arXiv:2611.03668
- Released: 2026-11-04
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 138 (2026-11-06): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-11-06/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Asset Pricing & Factors
- Authors: Chorok Lee

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

We develop ML models that predict when cross-factor predictability will erode, enabling prospective risk management. A decay prediction model achieves C-index $= 0.93$ on held-out factor pairs, providing early warning of signal erosion---the key predictor is initial signal strength: stronger signals decay faster (``regression to the mean''). An online regime detector enables real-time classification with 6.6-day average detection delay. Prior work explains why factors decay (arbitrage, publication effects); we predict when decay will occur. Limitation: The primary HML$\to$SMB signal does not replicate in post-break OOS (2013--2024); this null result is consistent with genuine decay but limits confirmatory claims. Motivation: Among 30 directed Fama-French factor pairs (1990--2024), predictability targeting the Size factor (SMB) decays fastest. Of 7 pairs showing exponential decay ($R^2 > 0.3$), 4 target SMB (Mkt-RF$\to$SMB, CMA$\to$SMB, HML$\to$SMB, RMW$\to$SMB; half-lives 2.4--4.1 years). This SMB-concentration pattern motivates the predictive models. Methodology: Using a regime-conditional Granger framework with Student-$t$ HMMs, we document structural breaks clustering around June 1998 ($p < 10^{-10}$). A pre-break OOS test (HMM trained 1990--1995, tested 1996--2007) confirms signals existed: HML$\to$SMB shows $p = 0.013$ (Elevated) and $p < 0.001$ (Crisis). The primary HML$\to$SMB signal does not replicate in post-break OOS (2013--2024), consistent with genuine decay rather than overfitting---after ${\sim}6$ half-lives, the expected signal is $<$1% of its 1990s peak. International analysis finds 2/4 non-US markets with Bonferroni-surviving OOS effects; correction for full specification search was not applied, so results remain exploratory.

## Related

- [Interpretable Machine Learning for Asset Pricing](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4473746/): The paper utilizes deep neural networks to more accurately estimate equity risk premia over time, enhancing the interpretability of machine learning in economics.
- [The Cross-Section of Factor Returns](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4441376/): Most of the 150 equity factors examined show positive returns but fail to deliver excess returns after accounting for risk, especially in downturns.
- [Are Penalty Shootouts Better Than a Coin Toss? Evidence From International Club Football in Europe](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2510.17641/): Using UEFA penalty shootout data (2000–2025) we find outcomes are essentially random—no measurable advantage from kicking order, venue, momentum, or team strength.
- [Optimal Investment and Consumption in a Stochastic Factor Model](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2509.09452/): The article discusses optimal investment and consumption in an incomplete stochastic factor model, offering a comprehensive characterization of the problem's well-posedness and an efficient numerical algorithm for computing the value function.
- [Model complexity and the performance of global versus regional models](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/5241880/): Complex algorithms in global models outperform regional models in cross-sectional asset pricing, contradicting previous studies favoring regional methods.
- [How Election Shocks Impact Markets: Evidence from Sectoral Stock Prices](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2504.02731/): Research indicates U.S. presidential election cycles impact sectoral stock markets, with candidate preferences influencing asset prices in energy, defense, and clean energy sectors.