---
title: Herding or Racing? Decomposing Cross-Account Order-Flow Persistence in On-Chain Markets
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2611.02616/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-11-06
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2611.02616
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02616
featured: 2026-11-06
citations: unknown
topic: Trading, Microstructure & Execution
---


# Herding or Racing? Decomposing Cross-Account Order-Flow Persistence in On-Chain Markets

Decomposing cross-account order-flow persistence on decentralized exchanges, the study isolates two components and finds that on-chain herding mostly reflects arbitrageurs racing to centralized prices, not independent traders.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02616
- Identifier: arXiv:2611.02616
- Released: 2026-11-03
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 138 (2026-11-06): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-11-06/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Trading, Microstructure & Execution
- Authors: Yichong Bai, Dingyue Kan

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

Most of the autocorrelation in trade signs on decentralized exchanges comes from pairs of trades sent by different wallets. For Uniswap v3, this has been read as herding dominating order splitting -- the reverse of what equity markets show. We show that this herding share mixes two quantities: the probability $p$ that consecutive orders come from the same account, which is small when thousands of wallets are trading, and the ratio $κ$ of cross-account to same-account sign correlation. For any $p$, $κ$ equals one under the public-signal benchmark of Tóth et al. and zero under independent order splitting. On Uniswap v3 USDC-WETH (one week each in 2023 and 2024), the herding share is 0.65-0.86, but $κ$ is only 0.05-0.10. On a fully on-chain EVM limit order book, the herding share is similar (0.61-0.87), but $κ$ is 0.72-0.76; among Uniswap swaps above USD 100k, it is 0.34-0.52. Where $κ$ is high, cross-account co-movement is mostly a race for the price on a centralized exchange. It is concentrated in orders a few blocks apart, and a cross-fitted gradient-boosted filter that sees only Binance data removes about three quarters or more of it. This race flow accounts for most of the losses of liquidity providers. We recommend reporting $κ$ alongside the herding share and modeling on-chain order flow as splitting traders plus arbitrageurs who respond to the centralized-exchange price.

## Related

- [Optimal Exit Time for Liquidity Providers in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2509.06510/): The study investigates the best way for a liquidity provider to withdraw liquidity in an automated market, balancing fees and potential losses, and offers insights into dynamic liquidity provision.
- [Optimal Fees for Liquidity Provision in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2508.08152/): The research investigates the earnings of passive liquidity providers in automated markets, suggesting that optimal fees should balance volume attraction and revenue generation, and dynamic fees can enhance results.
- [Arbitrage on Decentralized Exchanges](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2507.08302/): A study on a gas-fee competition game in decentralized exchanges reveals that arbitrageurs may opt not to trade when arbitrage opportunity and liquidity are low, but their expected profit could increase with higher arbitrage opportunity and liquidity.
- [A Coincidence of Wants Mechanism for Swap Trade Execution in Decentralized Exchanges](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2507.10149/): The article presents a mathematical model for efficiently identifying and completing trade cycles in decentralized exchange aggregators, preserving capital for liquidity providers.
- [Optimal Dynamic Fees in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2506.02869/): The research investigates the best dynamic fees in Automated Market Makers, suggesting fees that are linear in inventory and sensitive to price changes are optimal.
- [A Line Graph-Based Framework for Identifying Optimal Routing Paths in Decentralized Exchanges](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2504.15809/): The research presents a new algorithm for finding the best trading paths in decentralized exchanges, showing its potential for industry use due to its efficiency and cost-effectiveness.