---
title: Quantifying Repair Risk in Crypto Option Surfaces
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2611.00958/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-11-06
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2611.00958
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00958
featured: 2026-11-06
citations: unknown
topic: Derivatives & Volatility
---


# Quantifying Repair Risk in Crypto Option Surfaces

Option-surface repairs that satisfy no-arbitrage constraints admit multiple admissible solutions, and finite-difference amplification causes downstream Greeks and risk measures to diverge substantially.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00958
- Identifier: arXiv:2611.00958
- Released: 2026-11-03
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 138 (2026-11-06): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-11-06/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Derivatives & Volatility
- Authors: Tenghan Zhong

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

Option desks adjust crypto option quotes into price surfaces that remain within bid-ask intervals and satisfy standard no-arbitrage restrictions across strikes before computing Greeks, hedge quantities, or risk measures. For the same quote panel, however, these constraints may admit multiple such surfaces, which we call admissible repairs, with different downstream outputs. We define the resulting variation as repair risk and propose repair-risk validation, a matched framework for quantifying dispersion in Greeks, hedge quantities, and risk measures. The mechanism is finite-difference amplification: two admissible repairs within price distance $\varepsilon$ can differ in local normalized-strike curvature by $4\varepsilon/h^2$, where $h$ is local normalized-strike spacing. We evaluate repair risk on Deribit BTC and ETH option chains, using $L_1$ and $L_2$ projections of midpoint prices onto the same admissible set as matched controls. Across 108 matched evaluations spanning 18 sampled calendar months, the median 90th percentile of the scaled spot-gamma gap for $L_2$ versus the $ρ=10$ smoothness-penalized repair is nearly twenty times the matched $L_1$--$L_2$ control. We also instantiate NN-Proj, a neural-projection repair, to test whether learned repairs exhibit repair risk. Despite good held-out fit, its downstream outputs remain distinct from those of classical repairs. Across five seeds with the same training window and architecture, its curvature dispersion exceeds the matched $L_1$--$L_2$ control in 17 of 18 months ($p=1.45\times10^{-4}$). For a USD 1 million risk reversal, switching from $L_2$ to the $ρ=10$ repair shifts the median 90th-percentile hedge notional by 18.62 basis points of gross spot notional. VaR-style estimates also exhibit greater dispersion across repairs. The repair rule is therefore part of the risk model, not merely a feasibility check.

## Related

- [Decentralized and Centralized Options Trading: A Risk Premia Perspective](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4822783/): The research looks at OnChain options traded on a decentralized Ethereum blockchain exchange, underlining the differences in implied volatilities compared to OffChain options traded on centralized exchanges.
- [Composite likelihood estimation of stationary Gaussian processes with a view toward stochastic volatility](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2403.12653/): The first article discusses a framework for understanding parametric continuous-time stationary Gaussian processes, applied successfully to models describing the random log-spot variance of financial asset returns, including cryptocurrency.
- [Liquidity Premium, Liquidity-Adjusted Return and Volatility, and Extreme Liquidity](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4694674/): A study using crypto assets indicates that jumps in asset prices are signs of extreme liquidity and can be effectively modeled using autoregressive models adjusted with liquidity.
- [Hedging Properties of Algorithmic Investment Strategies using Long Short-Term Memory and Time Series models for Equity Indices](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2309.15640/): The study suggests a new method for hedging risky asset portfolios using ensemble algorithmic investment strategies, finding Bitcoin-based AIS to be the best diversifier for S&P 500 index-based AIS.
- [How market volatility responds to a preceding price trend: a lag-resolved measurement in cryptocurrencies and equities](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2611.04533/): Measuring minute-by-minute volatility response to preceding trends, the research finds asymmetry and evidence of one-sided temporal response in cryptocurrencies but not equities, decomposed via time-reversal symmetry.
- [Weekend Crypto Volatility and Monday Market Risk](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2610.35702/): Weekend cryptocurrency volatility predicts Monday variance in equities, commodities and bonds 11-22% better post-2024, following US Bitcoin ETF approval in late 2023.