---
title: Measuring Longer-Horizon Leveraged ETF Performance
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2610.39097/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-10-30
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2610.39097
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.39097
featured: 2026-10-30
citations: unknown
topic: Portfolio & Allocation
---


# Measuring Longer-Horizon Leveraged ETF Performance

The study shows that measuring leveraged ETF performance with arithmetic mean compounding can rank investments backwards and proposes using realized terminal wealth and expected log returns instead.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.39097
- Identifier: arXiv:2610.39097
- Released: 2026-10-30
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 137 (2026-10-30): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-10-30/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Portfolio & Allocation
- Authors: Chris Murray, Marco Sammon

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

Many investors hold leveraged exchange-traded funds (LETFs) for more than one day. Because these products reset leverage daily, their longer-horizon returns need not equal the stated leverage multiple times the underlying return. We explain this gap using a return identity that separates what we call the convexity bonus, volatility drag, and product costs. We also discuss several common ways to measure LETF performance and highlight how these measures can produce misleading assessments of how real-world LETFs perform. We propose evaluating ex-post performance using realized terminal wealth, which measures how much invested wealth grew. For ex-ante analysis, we propose using expected log returns to quantify how fast capital compounds over time. We show that estimating expected cumulative return by compounding the historical arithmetic mean can rank investments backwards, report gains for funds that lose money, suggest that infinite leverage is optimal when expected returns exceed borrowing cost, and reward temporary price fluctuations that reduce LETF wealth. We argue that even if the distribution of daily returns is known by the econometrician, expected terminal wealth is sensitive to whether the model draws days independently or draws monthly or annual blocks of daily returns and can be driven by a small number of economically infeasible payouts.

## Related

- [Regulating Cash Holdings: Assessing Lost Returns in Mutual Funds](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4478272/): Israeli mutual funds hold excessive cash, indicating a need for better liquidity management to reduce redemption risks.
- [STRAPSim: A Portfolio Similarity Metric for ETF Alignment and Portfolio Trades](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2509.24151/): STRAPSim, a new method for assessing portfolio similarity, surpasses existing measures by using semantic similarity, portfolio share weighting, and residual-aware greedy alignment, proving beneficial in ETF benchmarking, portfolio creation, and systematic execution.
- [The Performance of Household-held Mutual Funds: Evidence from the Euro Area](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4849419/): A study from 2009 to 2020 shows that Euro-area households prefer pricier, lower risk-adjusted return mutual funds, particularly equity funds, and tend to follow past returns.
- [Beat the Market: An Effective Intraday Momentum Strategy for S&P500 ETF (SPY)](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4824172/): The study investigates the success of an intraday momentum strategy on SPY, an ETF tracking the SP500, which resulted in a 1985 total return from 2007 to 2024.
- [Reaching for Duration and Leverage in the Treasury Market](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4816018/): The article reveals that the use of Treasury futures by mutual funds varies significantly over time and across funds, influencing the variation in aggregate Treasury futures open interest.
- [Machine Learning Mutual Fund Flows](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4812038/): Nonlinear machine learning models are more effective than linear models in predicting future fund flows, with past flows and the Morningstar rating as key predictors.