---
title: Investor's Last Exam: Can AI Agents Do Equity Investment Without Seeing the Future?
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2610.38342/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-10-30
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2610.38342
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38342
featured: 2026-10-30
citations: unknown
topic: ML & AI Methods
---


# Investor's Last Exam: Can AI Agents Do Equity Investment Without Seeing the Future?

Investor's Last Exam benchmarks AI agents on frozen financial databases, finding leading models score 68.1 overall yet only 52.5 on forecast accuracy.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38342
- Identifier: arXiv:2610.38342
- Released: 2026-10-30
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 137 (2026-10-30): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-10-30/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: ML & AI Methods
- Authors: Huangfei Jiang, Anning Hu, Kai Sheng, Yuchen Cai, Rui Ge, Xiangyu Kong, Jianghao Lin, Shuzi Chen, Jiyi Weng, Junchi Yan

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

Financial agents must form forecasts and investment judgments from decision-time evidence, with predictions evaluated against subsequent outcomes. Existing benchmarks assess financial knowledge, research workflows, or forecasting, but evaluating the full research process requires a strictly frozen information set and professional evaluation criteria. We introduce Investor's Last Exam (ILE), an equity-research benchmark led by experienced buy-side investors and fund managers. Its three components are a versioned financial database spanning 3.43 million document versions and nine source categories, supplemented by structured market data, with validated timestamps governing retrieval and computation; a task taxonomy organized around professional analyst deliverables; and an expert-led framework linking scoring criteria to sources, calculations, and assumptions through financial dependency graphs. Evaluation spans 86 assignments and jointly assesses research quality, forecast accuracy, and simulated investment performance. GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus 5.5 lead overall at 68.1 and 66.9 out of 100, yet even Astra scores only 52.5 on Forecast & Model. Our results show that even state-of-the-art models fail to translate overall research capability into predictive performance. ILE shifts the evaluation unit from isolated capabilities to the evidence--assumption--judgment chain, allowing researchers to locate where analytical advantages fail to translate into forecasts and investment judgments, and providing a traceable, diagnostic foundation for training and evaluating financial agents.

## Related

- [AlphaDiverse: Post-Training Local Quantitative Research Agents for Diverse Exploration in Alpha Factor Mining](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2609.29014/): Proposes a multi-agent system with post-training that automates alpha factor mining locally, using diverse research paths and joint optimization to broaden exploration while maintaining prediction quality.
- [Bounded Normative Equivalence in Human-AI Cooperation: Group Behaviour, Not Partner Labels, Predicts Cooperation under Anonymous Aggregate Feedback](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2601.20487/): AI agents in group settings can influence cooperation just like humans do, showing that social norms can adjust for both AI and human participants.
- [The Adoption and Usage of AI Agents: Early Evidence from Perplexity](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2512.07828/): A study of AI agent use with the Comet browser reveals that personal productivity and learning are the main reasons users interact with these tools.
- [General Social Agents](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2508.17407/): Modern AI agents can be used to apply social science theories to new settings with little or no modification, and have been found to predict human behavior more accurately than traditional methods in a sample of new games.
- [FinRobot: Generative Business Process AI Agents for Enterprise Resource Planning in Finance](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2506.01423/): The article discusses an AI-based framework for ERP systems that combines AI and business process modeling to automate complex tasks, reducing processing time and errors.
- [Can Generative AI agents behave like humans? Evidence from laboratory market experiments](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2505.07457/): Large Language Models (LLMs) have potential in mimicking human behavior in economic markets, but need more research for improved diversity and accuracy.