---
title: What Language Models Add to Healthcare-Equity Rankings, and What They Could Have Known
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2610.38056/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-10-30
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2610.38056
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38056
featured: 2026-10-30
citations: unknown
topic: Asset Pricing & Factors
---


# What Language Models Add to Healthcare-Equity Rankings, and What They Could Have Known

Language models improve one-year stock rankings for healthcare firms by 48%, especially when scientific texts cover trials or regulatory records, but contribute less at other horizons.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38056
- Identifier: arXiv:2610.38056
- Released: 2026-10-30
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 137 (2026-10-30): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-10-30/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Asset Pricing & Factors
- Authors: Haotong Fu, Xiyue Zhang, Jack Rose, Ding Sun, Erich Scheller, Eric Rose

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

In healthcare equities, much of what moves a single name arrives as text: filings, trial and regulatory records, news and analyst commentary. We evaluate how screened non-market features and language-model representations improve market-based equity rankings for US healthcare firms over 2020-2025. Adding balance-sheet and attention features improves the resulting hybrid's price- and liquidity-neutral rank information coefficient (IC) at one, three and twelve months. At twelve months, neutral IC rises from 0.063 to 0.093, a 48% increase, while raw IC rises from 0.289 to 0.298. Language models contribute most clearly at three months: among company-months with scientific-text coverage, a current embedding model raises the hybrid's neutral IC from 0.046 to 0.056. This increment is nominally significant (t = 2.8; paired 95% bootstrap interval [+0.006, +0.015]) and remains exploratory. A larger post hoc gain occurs in months containing trial or regulatory records, consistent with text complementing prices and financial statements at that horizon. Across all text, pre-2020 and current representations yield small positive three-month increments in both neutral and raw IC but no established twelve-month gain. Much of their ranking performance survives within-company time shuffling, consistent with a persistent company component. Rater-cutoff comparisons find negligible pre-cutoff advantages for current models over the pre-2020 rater at one and three months that do not shrink after the cutoffs; twelve-month hindsight attribution remains inconclusive. At twelve months, balance-sheet signals lead after rallies and in volatile markets, while attention leads after declines. Retrospective state-dependent blending improves on a static blend without an established advantage over the full hybrid. Results apply to a survivor-only sector sample and remain unadjusted for the full exploratory search.

## Related

- [Linguistic Passiveness in Earnings Calls and Stock Returns](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2610.19087/): Passive-voice fraction in earnings calls predicts temporary mispricings for good news and longer-run underperformance for bad news, independent of standard sentiment measures.
- [Debt Dictionaries](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/repec/fip-fedpwp-103784/): Stock and bond investors extract different value signals from earnings calls, with bondholders emphasizing operations and risk while equityholders focus on growth and innovation.
- [Measuring What is Repeated and Novel in Earnings Disclosures Using Optimal Transport](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2610.04094/): Decomposing earnings press releases and conference calls into shared and unique textual components shows that unique call content predicts returns better than repeated material.
- [Exogenous Risk, Hedging Pressure, and Risk Premia in Agricultural Commodity Markets](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/repec/ags-aaea26-404411/): Traders place 15% weight on USDA crop reports relative to private priors when forming price expectations, with this anchoring weight rising when private analyst disagreement increases.
- [Interpretable Deep Learning for Stock Returns: A Consensus-Bottleneck Asset Pricing Model](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2512.16251/): The Consensus-Bottleneck Asset Pricing Model uses a neural network to mimic analyst reasoning, showing how investor beliefs influence asset prices and enhancing long-term predictions for U.S. stocks.
- [Deep IV Factor Models](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/5283770/): The Deep Implied Volatility Factor Model, combining neural networks and linear regression, is proposed for estimating the daily Implied Volatility surface of individual stock options, improving performance around earnings announcements.