---
title: Weekend Crypto Volatility and Monday Market Risk
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2610.35702/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-10-30
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2610.35702
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35702
featured: 2026-10-30
citations: unknown
topic: Derivatives & Volatility
---


# Weekend Crypto Volatility and Monday Market Risk

Weekend cryptocurrency volatility predicts Monday variance in equities, commodities and bonds 11-22% better post-2024, following US Bitcoin ETF approval in late 2023.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35702
- Identifier: arXiv:2610.35702
- Released: 2026-10-27
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 137 (2026-10-30): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-10-30/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Derivatives & Volatility
- Authors: Pedram Ebadollahyvahed, Nneka Umeorah

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

Cryptocurrencies trade continuously while major traditional markets close over the weekend. We examine whether weekend cryptocurrency volatility predicts Monday variance in equity, commodity and fixed-income markets. Using daily range-based variance measures for Bitcoin, Ether, XRP, the S&P 500, gold and a US Treasury ETF over 2017-2026, we augment heterogeneous autoregressive models with a common weekend cryptocurrency factor. Predictive content is weak before 2024 but significant thereafter. In the post-2024 sample, a one-standard-deviation increase in the factor is associated with 27-54% higher fitted Monday variance. Adding the factor reduces out-of-sample QLIKE losses by 11-22%, although statistical evidence varies across markets. Friday cryptocurrency volatility does not reproduce the result, and coin-specific variation adds no significant predictive information beyond the common factor. An endogenous procedure estimates a break in late 2023, during growing anticipation of US spot-Bitcoin ETF approval. However, ETF-flow interactions provide no evidence of amplification through greater measured Monday flow activity, leaving the mechanism unresolved. The findings suggest that calendar-specific volatility measures reveal predictive information that aggregate connectedness measures may obscure.

## Related

- [Adaptive LASSO-MGARCH for Multivariate Volatility Forecasting](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/repec/cdf-wpaper-2026-4/): Introducing coefficient-specific penalization into multivariate GARCH equations reduces complexity and improves out-of-sample covariance forecasts across bonds, equities, and commodities.
- [Commodities Returns and Alternatives](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/5276594/): Hilary Till spoke at the Women Investment Professionals organization in Chicago, discussing commodity indices, futures contracts, and hedge funds.
- [Crude Oil Volatility Forecasting](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/repec/wly-jforec-v-43-y-2024-i-5-p-1422-1446/): The study shows that machine learning forecasts offer superior predictions for the volatility of WTI futures prices, resulting in economic benefits.
- [Currency Exchange Rate Volatility and Prices in Indonesia](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4935428/): Research shows significant interactions between gold and coal prices, exchange rates, and interest rates on Indonesian stock mutual funds from 2019-2022.
- [Asian Stock Exchange Volatility Analysis](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/repec/eme-jcefts-jcefts-01-2024-0009/): The research shows volatility clustering in the return series of crude oil, Bitcoin, and selected Asian stock exchanges, with varying degrees of short and long-term volatility spillover.
- [Ensemble Boosting Trees for Volatility Forecasting](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/repec/eee-reveco-v-92-y-2024-i-c-p-1595-1615/): The study finds ensemble boosting tree models, particularly CatBoost and LightGBM, more effective than traditional models in predicting China's crude oil futures volatility, with macroeconomic and HAR-type variables impacting forecasts differently.