---
title: Jawboning the Fed: Do Markets Listen When Administrations Talk?
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2610.32300/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-10-30
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2610.32300
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32300
featured: 2026-10-30
citations: unknown
topic: Macro-Finance & Rates
---


# Jawboning the Fed: Do Markets Listen When Administrations Talk?

Analysis of four decades of news finds dovish political pressure lowers near-term rate expectations by roughly one basis point per event, while hawkish pressure shows no effect.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32300
- Identifier: arXiv:2610.32300
- Released: 2026-10-26
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 137 (2026-10-30): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-10-30/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Macro-Finance & Rates
- Authors: Michela Baretti, Umberto Collodel, Jacopo Zacché

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

We provide the first systematic evidence on whether financial markets price political pressure on the Federal Reserve as a signal of future monetary policy. Using approximately four decades of Reuters newswire articles from 1988 to 2025, classified by an open-weight large language model ensemble into dovish and hawkish pressure, we estimate the daily response of interest rate expectations across the term structure, the US dollar, inflation compensation, and market volatility. Dovish pressure lowers near-term rate expectations by roughly one basis point per pressure event---equivalent to a four-percent increase in the implied probability of a rate cut at the next FOMC meeting---with the effect decaying monotonically and vanishing beyond the three-month horizon. Hawkish pressure has no detectable effect. Furthermore, excluding the Trump presidencies does not weaken the estimate, ruling out the possibility that the result is confined to an idiosyncratic recent episode. The response is accompanied by dollar depreciation, with stable inflation compensation and market volatility. We interpret the pattern as markets pricing anticipated monetary accommodation, rather than a credibility tax on the nominal anchor.

## Related

- [Inflation—Who Cares? Monetary Policy in Times of Low Attention](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2105.05297/): Who Cares?: The decrease in public attention to inflation after the Great Inflation period in the U.S. complicates managing inflation expectations and can lead to inflation-attention traps, suggesting a need to increase the inflation target.
- [Post-COVID inflation and the monetary policy dilemma: an agent-based scenario analysis](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2306.01284/): A new modelling approach using the Mark-0 Agent-Based Model explores the impact of regulatory policies on inflationary dynamics resulting from COVID-19-related shocks.
- [Beyond monetary policy: Macroprudential responses to inflationary shocks](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/repec/ptu-wpaper-w202609/): Pre-emptive, countercyclical macroprudential tools strengthen banking resilience and dampen external shocks in a monetary union, while procyclical tightening worsens outcomes.
- [Monetary-Policy Risk and Equilibrium Asset Prices](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/7585438/): Asset prices respond to monetary policy uncertainty around FOMC announcements; a New Keynesian model shows policy risk accounts for much of equity and inflation-bond risk premia and weakens activity when elevated.
- [The Taming of the Skew: Asymmetric Inflation Risk and Monetary Policy](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/repec/bde-wpaper-2626/): A model with time-varying skewness in cost-push shocks generates persistent stagflationary effects; optimal policy leans against the balance of inflation risks.
- [Energy and Monetary Policy in the Euro Area](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/repec/adl-wpaper-2026-07/): A DSGE model reveals energy and exchange-rate shocks drive euro inflation volatility, and optimal policy can exploit the exchange-rate channel rather than looking through energy shocks.