---
title: Basis-Only Funding Is Not Dividend Fair: Settlement Design in Crypto Equity Perpetuals
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2610.22839/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-10-23
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2610.22839
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22839
featured: 2026-10-23
citations: unknown
topic: Crypto & DeFi
---


# Basis-Only Funding Is Not Dividend Fair: Settlement Design in Crypto Equity Perpetuals

Premium-index funding cannot replicate shareholder cash flows for dividend-paying assets; fairness requires discrete event credits matching dividend atoms, not continuous basis adjustment.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22839
- Identifier: arXiv:2610.22839
- Released: 2026-10-19
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 136 (2026-10-23): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-10-23/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Crypto & DeFi
- Authors: Donghwa Seo, Doohwi Cha, Seunghan Son, Juyeong Lee, Minsuk Sung, Minjae Lee

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

Crypto venues increasingly list perpetual futures on equities and other real-world assets (RWAs), which trade continuously yet reference dividend-paying stocks: a long equity perpetual marked to the ex-dividend cash price bears the ex-dividend drop without receiving the dividend. We ask whether the premium-index funding architecture these venues run -- funding set from the contemporaneous basis $e_t=P_t-S_t$ rather than a carry target -- can replicate shareholder cash flows for traders entering and exiting at arbitrary times. It cannot. Funding serves two roles that coincide for non-dividend crypto assets but split apart for equities: basis control and settlement. We give the fair-funding identity, cast timing fairness as an optimal-stopping condition, and characterize when the basis is a sufficient statistic for the fair target. The decisive obstruction is measure-theoretic: a predictable dividend is an atom, and no absolutely continuous funding path can replicate an atom over holding intervals even in the weak limit, so fairness must match the atom with an atom -- an event credit. Exchange-native data confirm this: at each covered ex-date one venue posts a discrete funding atom equal to $-D/(\mathrm{Mark}-D)$ while a standard premium-index venue posts none, transferring the dividend across venues -- from native funding alone, with no external spot.

## Related

- [The Impact of Bitcoin ETF Approval on Bitcoin's Hedging Properties Against Traditional Assets](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2512.12815/): Changing Dynamics with Traditional Assets: In January 2024, the approval of a Bitcoin Spot ETF boosted interest from big investors and made Bitcoin more closely linked to stock markets, while its connections to gold remained steady and its relationship with the U.S. Dollar stayed negative.
- [Beyond the mean: limit theory and tests for infinite-mean autoregressive conditional durations](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2505.06190/): The research applies a unified asymptotic theory to high-frequency cryptocurrency ETF trading data, revealing infinite-mean durations for all five cryptocurrencies studied.
- [Spot Bitcoin ETF](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4810965/): Bitcoin ETFs have attracted over $20 billion in their initial weeks of trading, significantly influencing bitcoin prices and exceeding daily bitcoin production by fivefold.
- [Reassessing Bitcoin’s Role under ETF-Driven Institutionalization: A Time-Frequency Connectedness Analysis](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/7566372/): The research shows that after U.S. Bitcoin ETF approval in January 2024, return and volatility linkages between Bitcoin and equities strengthened substantially, with volatility spillovers becoming markedly asymmetric from stocks to crypto.
- [Bitcoin ETFs Performance](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/5138230/): The study analyzes the performance of spot bitcoin ETFs in their first trading year, shedding light on the complexities of U.S. regulatory decisions.
- [Bitcoin ETF Impact](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/repec/eee-finana-v-97-y-2025-i-c-s1057521924007427/): The study finds that ETF asset managers became the major long-side participants following the introduction of the ProShares bitcoin strategy ETF.