---
title: E-Backtesting Expected Shortfall without Value-at-Risk Forecasts under Time-series Models
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2610.17681/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-10-16
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2610.17681
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17681
featured: 2026-10-16
citations: unknown
topic: Risk, Credit & Banking
---


# E-Backtesting Expected Shortfall without Value-at-Risk Forecasts under Time-series Models

Sequential backtests for Expected Shortfall using only observed losses and ES forecasts control false rejections, with time-series extension under AR-GARCH structure proving convergent under grid refinement.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17681
- Identifier: arXiv:2610.17681
- Released: 2026-10-14
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 135 (2026-10-16): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-10-16/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Risk, Credit & Banking
- Authors: Ruodu Wang, Jingcheng Yu

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

Expected Shortfall (ES) measures the average size of tail losses. Its sequential backtests typically also require a Value-at-Risk (VaR) forecast. We develop two e-backtesting methods using only observed losses and ES forecasts: one for iid losses only and the other for time series under an AR-GARCH conditional VaR structure. Under the stated assumptions, both control false rejections at any stopping time. For the time-series method, validity requires a fixed parameter--quantile pair representing the conditional VaR path and a positive report margin. The time-series statistic takes an infimum over possible parameter and VaR values. We choose the betting process $(λ_t)$ by maximizing an empirical growth rate averaged across candidate parameters. We compute the statistic by continuous VaR profiling on a dense parameter grid. For grid approximations, we prove convergence to the continuous infimum, together with convergence of the probability of false rejection, as the grid is refined over a fixed monitoring period. Lower and upper bounds for the VaR infimum on the parameter grid control the accuracy of the numerical profiling. Simulations, including ES reports that change from over-reporting to under-reporting, and an application to daily NASDAQ losses provide numerical comparisons with VaR--ES e-processes and fixed-sample ES backtests, assessing detection frequencies and the timing of rejections.

## Related

- [A note on subadditivity of value at risks (VaRs): A new connection to comonotonicity](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/doi/10-1017-jpr-2025-31/): The research reveals a new characteristic of value at risk (VaR), stating that its subadditivity holds for any confidence level only if the loss random variables are comonotonic.
- [Quantiles under ambiguity and risk sharing](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2412.19546/): The study introduces Choquet Expected Shortfall, a new class of risk measures, and provides optimization algorithms and examples using financial data.
- [Time-Series Foundation AI Model for Value-at-Risk Forecasting](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2410.11773/): The research highlights the superior performance of a time-series model, TimesFM, in forecasting Value-at-Risk, with fine-tuning further enhancing the results.
- [Optimal insurance design with Lambda-Value-at-Risk](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2408.09799/): The paper studies optimal insurance solutions using the Lambda-Value-at-Risk model, revealing that a truncated stop-loss indemnity is ideal under certain conditions and discusses the effect of model uncertainty.
- [Adaptive Multilevel Stochastic Approximation of the Value-at-Risk](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2408.06531/): The paper introduces a multilevel stochastic approximation algorithm that adaptively selects the number of inner samples to compute the value-at-risk of a financial loss, improving the previous scheme's complexity.
- [Risk sharing with lambda value-at-risk under heterogeneous beliefs](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2408.03147/): The research investigates risk distribution among multiple parties using Lambda value at risk, offering formulas for optimal allocations under differing beliefs.