---
title: Three options are roughly enough - Variance-optimal semi-static hedging in the rough Heston model
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2610.13543/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-10-16
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2610.13543
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13543
featured: 2026-10-16
citations: unknown
topic: Derivatives & Volatility
---


# Three options are roughly enough - Variance-optimal semi-static hedging in the rough Heston model

The paper shows that combining dynamic trading in the underlying with static positions in three vanilla options reduces variance-swap hedging error by more than 95% across different market roughness regimes.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13543
- Identifier: arXiv:2610.13543
- Released: 2026-10-12
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 135 (2026-10-16): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-10-16/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Derivatives & Volatility
- Authors: Paolo Di Tella, Martin Keller-Ressel, Beatrice Ongarato

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

This paper studies semi-static variance-optimal hedging of variance swaps in the rough Heston model under a risk-neutral measure. We combine dynamic trading in the underlying asset with static positions in a finite basket of European options, with the aim of minimizing the variance of the residual hedging error. Exploiting the Markovian lift provided by the forward variance curve, the Fourier representations of the claims and the Laplace transform characterization of the log-price, we derive semi-explicit formulas for the optimal strategies and the hedging error. We then study the optimal claim selection problem, investigating numerically how the choice of static instruments depends on the Hurst index. Under standard parametrization, we discover that "three options are roughly enough", i.e. adding three static vanilla options reduces the hedging error by more than 95% relative to the purely dynamic hedge for all considered roughness regimes H= 0.1, 0.3, 0.5.

## Related

- [Rough Volatility: Fact or Artefact?](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2203.13820/): Fact or Artifact: The study proposes a new method to estimate the roughness of financial asset volatility, attributing observed roughness to microstructure noise.
- [Prediction of linear fractional stable motions using codifference, with application to non-Gaussian rough volatility](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2507.15437/): A new method for predicting future changes in linear fractional stable motion (LFSM) has been proposed, which performs better than the fractional Brownian motion in predicting high-frequency FX rates and volatility time series.
- [Multivariate Rough Volatility](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/5065415/): The article introduces a multivariate version of the Rough Fractional Stochastic Volatility model for analyzing logvolatilities, providing an estimator and confirming its theory through simulation.
- [Rough differential equations for volatility](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2412.21192/): The paper presents a method for jointly lifting a Brownian motion and a low-regularity adapted stochastic rough path, useful for modeling rough volatility.
- [Risk premium and rough volatility](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2403.11897/): The paper examines the effect of unpredictable risk on pricing in a rough volatility model, emphasizing the random nature of the market price of volatility risk.
- [A path-dependent PDE solver based on signature kernels](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2403.11738/): The article introduces a new, verifiably effective kernel-based solver for path-dependent partial differential equations (PPDEs). This provides a practical alternative to Monte Carlo methods, especially for option pricing under rough volatility.