---
title: The Agentic ETF: How Agentic Trading Becomes an Asset Class
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2610.06856/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-10-09
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2610.06856
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06856
featured: 2026-10-09
citations: unknown
topic: ML & AI Methods
---


# The Agentic ETF: How Agentic Trading Becomes an Asset Class

Proposes that large-language-model-driven trading agents delegated to autonomous execution define a nascent asset class, mapping infrastructure layers and projecting potential trillions in assets by 2030.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06856
- Identifier: arXiv:2610.06856
- Released: 2026-10-07
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 134 (2026-10-09): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-10-09/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: ML & AI Methods
- Authors: Amandeep Singh

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

Three structural trends are converging in public markets: the exchange-traded fund (ETF) has become the dominant fund wrapper, actively managed ETFs are the fastest-growing segment within it, and algorithmic systems now mediate the overwhelming majority of trading volume. We argue that their intersection defines a nascent asset class -- the \emph{Agentic ETF}, a fund whose investment process is delegated to autonomous, large-language-model-driven trading agents that reason over data and execute without a human in the loop. We define agentic trading and distinguish it from rule-based algorithmic trading and robo-advice, decompose the agentic-trading infrastructure into six layers, and identify the incumbent players and structural gaps at each layer. We then present ScalarField.io as a reference implementation of an integrated agentic-trading stack -- spanning a unified multi-venue execution registry, isolated strategy agents with continuous broker reconciliation, first-party market data, and metered compute -- and map its primitives to each layer of the stack. A transparent, assumption-stated sizing exercise suggests the Agentic ETF could plausibly reach hundreds of billions to low trillions of dollars in assets under management by 2030.

## Related

- [Bounded Normative Equivalence in Human-AI Cooperation: Group Behaviour, Not Partner Labels, Predicts Cooperation under Anonymous Aggregate Feedback](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2601.20487/): AI agents in group settings can influence cooperation just like humans do, showing that social norms can adjust for both AI and human participants.
- [The Adoption and Usage of AI Agents: Early Evidence from Perplexity](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2512.07828/): A study of AI agent use with the Comet browser reveals that personal productivity and learning are the main reasons users interact with these tools.
- [General Social Agents](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2508.17407/): Modern AI agents can be used to apply social science theories to new settings with little or no modification, and have been found to predict human behavior more accurately than traditional methods in a sample of new games.
- [FinRobot: Generative Business Process AI Agents for Enterprise Resource Planning in Finance](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2506.01423/): The article discusses an AI-based framework for ERP systems that combines AI and business process modeling to automate complex tasks, reducing processing time and errors.
- [Can Generative AI agents behave like humans? Evidence from laboratory market experiments](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2505.07457/): Large Language Models (LLMs) have potential in mimicking human behavior in economic markets, but need more research for improved diversity and accuracy.
- [Are Generative AI Agents Effective Personalized Financial Advisors?](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2504.05862/): Large AI language models can match human financial advisors but may lead to unsuitable investments due to struggle with conflicting needs, despite users often favoring extroverted AI personas.