---
title: Oracle-Parametrized Constant Function Market Makers: From Price Feeds to Pricing Rules
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2609.33799/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-10-02
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2609.33799
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.33799
featured: 2026-10-02
citations: unknown
topic: Crypto & DeFi
---


# Oracle-Parametrized Constant Function Market Makers: From Price Feeds to Pricing Rules

A framework shows when oracle-informed automated market makers reduce loss versus rebalancing and improve capital efficiency, with counterfactual backtests on SPY data.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.33799
- Identifier: arXiv:2609.33799
- Released: 2026-09-29
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 133 (2026-10-02): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-10-02/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Crypto & DeFi
- Authors: Hamed Amini, Zachary Feinstein

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

This paper introduces oracle-parametrized automated market makers (OP-AMMs), i.e., automated market makers whose quoted price depends jointly on the pool reserves and an external oracle price. In doing so, we extend the information-agnostic AMM framework to settings, such as tokenized securities, for which price discovery occurs off-chain. Under a strict oracle-contraction condition, we show that the quoted price of any OP-AMM interpolates between the oracle price and an implicit autarkic price determined by the pool reserves. We then derive a general loss-versus-rebalancing (LVR) decomposition that separates the residual exposure to market lags from the losses induced by oracle errors. This analysis is further extended to stale, discrete-update oracles and to sandwich attacks around oracle updates. Using this framework, we find conditions under which OP-AMMs simultaneously increase local capital efficiency and reduce normalized LVR relative to information-agnostic AMMs. However, sufficiently noisy or stale oracles can reverse these gains. A counterfactual backtest using one-second SPY NBBO data is provided to demonstrate these trade-offs. In particular, we map the Pareto-efficient frontier of oracle-parametrized constant function market maker (OP-CFMM) designs across stylized oracle regimes.

## Related

- [A theoretical framework for fees in AMMs](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2404.03976/): The study explores the workings of arbitrage in decentralized finance automated market makers (AMMs), aiming to understand how AMMs can optimize revenue or minimize losses, and models the dynamics of arbitrage activity.
- [Decentralised Finance and Automated Market Making: Predictable Loss and Optimal Liquidity Provision](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2309.08431/): The study outlines the wealth dynamics of strategic liquidity providers in constant product markets, proposes an optimal liquidity provision strategy, and uses Uniswap v3 data to show its effectiveness.
- [Axioms for Automated Market Makers: A Mathematical Framework in FinTech and Decentralized Finance](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2210.01227/): Mathematical Framework: The research introduces a new framework for Automated Market Makers, suggesting a unique fee structure and a novel AMM that reduces divergence loss.
- [Learning from DeFi: Would Automated Market Makers Improve Equity Trading?](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4531670/): The study suggests that optimally designed automated market makers could potentially save U.S. investors billions in transaction costs each year.
- [Decentralised Finance and Automated Market Making: Execution and Speculation](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4144743/): The study investigates automated market makers, particularly constant product market makers, and develops two optimal trading strategies using stochastic optimal control tools, as demonstrated with Uniswap v3 data.
- [Active Liquidity On Chain: Evidence from PropAMMs Across Chains](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2609.38056/): Proprietary AMMs earn 0.37 to 1.19 basis points within two seconds by repricing continuously and avoiding arbitrage, compared to passive AMMs losing 0.22 to 0.62 basis points.