---
title: Evolution of Market Microstructure in the Age of AI
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2609.33058/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-10-02
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2609.33058
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.33058
featured: 2026-10-02
citations: unknown
topic: Trading, Microstructure & Execution
---


# Evolution of Market Microstructure in the Age of AI

A survey traces how market design has evolved from floor trading through electronic exchanges to AI agents, examining whether markets can allocate goods efficiently without full revelation.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.33058
- Identifier: arXiv:2609.33058
- Released: 2026-09-29
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 133 (2026-10-02): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-10-02/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): not tracked
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Trading, Microstructure & Execution
- Authors: Irene Aldridge

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

Market microstructure studies how trading rules turn orders into prices and allocations. Those rules have been rebuilt repeatedly: for floor traders, electronic limit order books and high-frequency trading, batch auctions and dark pools, blockchains run by automated market makers and block builders, and now AI agents that discover, pay for, and compete over resources. This survey traces that evolution through one question: can a market allocate scarce goods efficiently and fairly without participants revealing everything they know and want? Each technological shift moved the binding constraint of market design from trader rationality to speed, to control over transaction ordering, to the dimensionality of what participants can report. Impossibility results persist; only their cost moves. We review evidence on high-frequency trading, trading venues, automated market makers, extractable value and algorithmic collusion, and identify allocation as the missing layer of the agent-commerce protocol stack.

## Related

- [Evolution of Market Microstructure in the Age of AI From Double-Sided Continuous Auctions to Agentic Markets](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/7530158/): A survey traces how market design rules evolved from floor trading to limit order books to automated market makers to agent-based trading systems.
- [Event-Based Limit Order Book Simulation under a Neural Hawkes Process: Application in Market-Making](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2502.17417/): An event-driven Limit Order Book model using a Neural Hawkes process is proposed to simulate high-frequency dynamics in financial markets, offering a more accurate depiction of trade execution.
- [Robust Market Making with Hawkes Order Flow and Price Impact via Adversarial Reinforcement Learning](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2609.22785/): The research extends adversarial reinforcement learning for market making to handle self-exciting order arrivals and price impact, using an LSTM module to improve robustness in complex microstructure environments.
- [Optimal Exit Time for Liquidity Providers in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2509.06510/): The study investigates the best way for a liquidity provider to withdraw liquidity in an automated market, balancing fees and potential losses, and offers insights into dynamic liquidity provision.
- [Optimal Fees for Liquidity Provision in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2508.08152/): The research investigates the earnings of passive liquidity providers in automated markets, suggesting that optimal fees should balance volume attraction and revenue generation, and dynamic fees can enhance results.
- [Optimal Dynamic Fees in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2506.02869/): The research investigates the best dynamic fees in Automated Market Makers, suggesting fees that are linear in inventory and sensitive to price changes are optimal.